On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:37, Simon Wood <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:simon@mungewell.org">simon@mungewell.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:18:39 -0500<br> <div class="Ih2E3d">"Sebastian Silva" <<a href="mailto:sebastian@fuentelibre.org">sebastian@fuentelibre.org</a>> wrote:<br> <br> </div><div class="Ih2E3d">> I was surprised that our main UI metaphor - a CHILD, the center of<br> > activities... a Symbol for Interacting and Sharing... would be<br> > restricted for our use as a community movement.<br> <br> </div>Personally I am very supprised that the 'XO' child symbol would be limited in such a way. Do we have an offical word on this.<br> <div class="Ih2E3d"><br> > But now we're expected to embed another Copyrighted, Trademarked logo,<br> > that carries no meaning or significance for our target audience, nor<br> > any possible use in the user interface.<br> ><br> <br> </div>Any branding should be contained within optional packages (maybe which are distribution specific) so that they can be completely removed if need be.</blockquote></div><br>It would be trivial to create a index page, similar to the existing library indexer, which stitched together all of the component packages information. <br>