<tt>"Walter Bender" <walter.bender@gmail.com>schrieb am 13.05.2008 18:41:57: > Ah. I was missing a subtly: do we agree that activities can be > released on their own timeframe, but that some activities are released > with the Sugar releases? For example, Write could be updated whenever > the Abiword team feels it is appropriate, perhaps in sync with other > Abiword releases, but a Sugar release would always include a working > Write? Is this the Gnome model? </tt> <tt>I don't think that it is necessary to sync the release date of Sugar and the Activities. But what is definitely necessary is to sync versioning. </tt> <tt>I'm still testing it out (we have a small XO kindergarten at Linuxwochen Vienna this Saturday). At the moment it seems that about 50% of all Activities won't work with Version 703 or have never really worked at all. </tt> <tt>If you include all GCompris Activities the number probably goes up to 80–90% of Activities that won't work in one way or the other (no .xo file available, missing rpm packages, won’t start, major functional glitches,…).</tt> <tt>Without any dependency checking in the .xo files and no information at all that e.g. VideoChat Version X is supposed to work with Sugar version Y you are forced to spend many frustrating hours rechecking everything with each and every new Sugar release.</tt> <tt>cu andreas</tt>