Just a me too reply: I really agree that tags and descriptions will be less used if they can't be edited within an activity. Eduardo <div>2008/3/3, Christoph Derndorfer <<a href="mailto:e0425826@student.tuwien.ac.at">e0425826@student.tuwien.ac.at</a>>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hey all, I had previously mentioned (<a href="http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-February/004397.html">http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-February/004397.html</a>) that I believe that [[Human Interface Guidelines]] should contain some best-practice examples for developers. Now I was looking through some of the ideas for the next version of the Journal and that made me realize that it might make sense to add Journal tagging support directly to activities. At least to me that feature is great when using 'record' to take photos as I can directly add the name and tags from within the activity by clicking on the 'I' button of any photo. With all other activities I have to switch to the Journal and do that editing there which is quite inconvenient. Especially when it comes to activities such as 'paint', 'write' and 'measure' which produce quite a lot of output in the form of different usage-threads (e.g. different temperature-measurements for a chemistry experiment). Please let me know what you think. Regards, Christoph P.S. This message was written while driving 140km/h on the Autobahn from Chemnitz to Hannover... ;-) _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list <a href="mailto:Sugar@lists.laptop.org">Sugar@lists.laptop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar">http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar</a> </blockquote></div>