I certainly hope speex is included. Is there a better open source voice codec out there? SJ<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/5/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Takashi Yamamiya</b> <<a href="mailto:tak@metatoys.org">
tak@metatoys.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br><br>I have a question about Speex <a href="http://www.speex.org/">
http://www.speex.org/</a> on OLPC. I added a<br>feature about sound compressing in etoys activity. We are going to use<br>it for interactive voice tutorial contents for etoys. I chose Speex<br>as the codec because it seems to be the most efficient for human
<br>voice, and the OLPC os image includes Speex already. But Bert<br>suggested me that we were not sure if we could depend on it.<br><br>So my question is that Speex library on the OLPC is just by accident,<br>or intentional? Can I assume Speex is available on the OLPC? I think
<br>including Speex is also good for other activity like voice chat.<br><br>Regards,<br>- Takashi<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Sugar mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Sugar@laptop.org">Sugar@laptop.org
</a><br><a href="http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar">http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar</a><br></blockquote></div><br>