[Sugar-devel] Proposal to merge sugarlabs/musicblocks-launcher and srevinsaju/musicblocks-app

[Srevin Saju]

Perfect, I can create the Pull request proposing the changes :D

Thanks Ibiam


On 10/10/20 4:13 PM, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote:
> I agree to a merge which will be the features which exist in your repo 
> that don't exist in music blocks launcher.
> -- 
> Ibiam Chihurumnaya
> ibiamchihurumnaya at gmail.com <mailto:ibiamchihurumnaya at gmail.com>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 6:46 PM Srevin Saju <srevinsaju at sugarlabs.org 
> <mailto:srevinsaju at sugarlabs.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hello
>
>     Hope all are having a safe time.
>
>     I was wondering if we should merge srevinsaju/musicblocks-app to
>     sugarlabs/musicblock-launcher. Musicblocks launcher depends
>     directly on
>     my repository, so it would be considerably better to merge both the
>     repositories.
>
>     Some information
>
>       * *Musicblocks app* 
>     (https://github.com/srevinsaju/musicblocks-app
>     <https://github.com/srevinsaju/musicblocks-app>
>         <https://github.com/srevinsaju/musicblocks-app
>     <https://github.com/srevinsaju/musicblocks-app>>) is a set of
>         javascript files and shell scripts to automatically patch the
>         upstream musicblocks source code to continuously create the
>     Electron
>         based AppImages, Snaps, Windows Binary Executables (.exe) and
>     macOS
>         (.dmg)
>       * *Musicblocks launcher
>         *(https://github.com/sugarlabs/musicblocks-launcher
>     <https://github.com/sugarlabs/musicblocks-launcher>
>         <https://github.com/sugarlabs/musicblocks-launcher
>     <https://github.com/sugarlabs/musicblocks-launcher>>), by Christopher
>         Liu pulls the data from musicblocks-app and then helps to create
>         flatpaks.
>
>     It would be great if we could unify the process and maintain a single
>     repository at `sugarlabs`'s GitHub Organization, as it would be
>     difficult for people to discover the scattered binaries
>
>     What would be your suggestion? I would be glad to fix them, or do any
>     other changes.
>
>     -- 
>     --
>     V/r
>     Srevin Saju
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sugar-devel mailing list
>     Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>     <mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>     http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>     <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel>
>
-- 
--
V/r
Srevin Saju

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4849 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20201010/f5113e9d/attachment-0001.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20201010/f5113e9d/attachment-0001.sig>