[Sugar-devel] Discussing GSOC project sugarizer knowledge activity pack

[prakash ujjwal]

Thanks for the clarification.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 10:32 PM Lionel Laské <lionel.laske at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Le lun. 16 mars 2020 à 15:35, prakash ujjwal <prakashujjwal1010 at gmail.com>
> a écrit :
>
>> Thanks Lionel.
>>
>> Regarding the second question,
>> If I am the child or user, I have my skills set of which some of are
>> validated by me and some skills are not.
>> So, I share the activity ,the users joining my activity instance, will
>> get all my skills set but can't edit those skills. ( Like exerciser
>> activity)
>> Also they can't see which activities are validated or not validated by
>> me.
>>
>
> You're wrong. They can see which activities are validated and even see
> proof of validation if there is some.
> Think to this feature like a way to show your school report card - with
> grade in each area - to other.
>
>
>
>> But if we talk about the use for sharing skills set feature.
>> Is it to,
>> 1) Let teachers see the skill set the child(one who is sharing the
>> activity) wants to acquire ,
>>
>
> And see the current skills the child already acquire.
>
>
>
>> 2) let other children use the same skill set as others for themselves
>> Am I right?
>>
>>
> Once again, it's just to see the current skill the child already acquire.
> The skill set will be shared by the teacher at the beginning of the year
> (*) so every child should already have the same skill set. So sharing the
> skill set using presence is not a way to retrieve the same skill set.
>
>
>> Are their any other uses?
>>
>>
> No other use case for the share feature.
>
>                Lionel.
>
> (*) By publishing it on the shared journal for example. The activity will
> also propose some existing skill set (French Primary School, Montessori,
> ...) and the user should be able to retrieve a new skill set via an URL
> (like the feature Library/Add library in Video Viewer activity).
>
> Thanks
>>
>>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 7:29 PM Lionel Laské <lionel.laske at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Prakash,
>>>
>>> 1) No need for validation. It's a self declarative skill.
>>>
>>> 2) The idea is for a children to shared the activity with other (teacher
>>> or children). In read-only mode.
>>>
>>> Hope it helps.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>>         Lionel.
>>>
>>>
>>> Le dim. 15 mars 2020 à 17:00, <sugar-devel-request at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:36:09 +0530
>>>> From: prakash ujjwal <prakashujjwal1010 at gmail.com>
>>>> To: Sugar-dev Devel <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>>>> Subject: [Sugar-devel] Discussing GSOC project sugarizer knowledge
>>>>         activity pack
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>         <CA+Gs6iW4KTaMdJbS1N5VjjFzBYeTM-v1qpDgMPCKyS8oj13=
>>>> fw at mail.gmail.com>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> This is Prakash Ujjwal.
>>>> I am participating in gsoc 2020.
>>>> and I find sugarizer knowledge pack idea very interesting.
>>>> I have some questions regarding the same.
>>>>
>>>> 1) does the multimedia elements submitted by the children while
>>>> validating
>>>> the skill, needs to be validated or verified by other users or teachers?
>>>>
>>>> 2) what does the line"it should be possible to share it's skills on the
>>>> network" means exactly
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL: <
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20200315/d5033630/attachment-0001.htm
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20200317/d4e6bfb4/attachment-0001.htm>