[Sugar-devel] why cannot most of sugar apps be packaged as flatpacks?

Martin Abente martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com
Mon Nov 25 08:40:01 EST 2019

Hello Thomas,

I am actually working on packaging sugar apps with flatpak, and publushing
them in Flathub. See

The work goes beyond just packaging, but also doing some porting so the
experience is properly integrated into the desktop paradigm.

I still just getting started, but I am getting ready to have some GCI tasks
as well.

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:35 AM Thomas Gilliard <satellitgo at gmail.com>

> <satellit> this is silverblue f32 1119 has Turtleblocks 220 etoys and
> labyrinth 0.6 as flatpacks
> <satellit> why cannot most of sugar apps be packaged as flatpacks?
> Google tasks? walterbender?
> <satellit> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_32#Silverblue
> <satellit> using system 76 laptop with it installed
> <satellit> #flatpack #silverblue
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20191125/6c7fbffa/attachment.html>

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list