[Sugar-devel] why cannot most of sugar apps be packaged as flatpacks?

[Martin Abente]

Hello Thomas,

I am actually working on packaging sugar apps with flatpak, and publushing
them in Flathub. See
https://blogs.gnome.org/tchx84/2019/11/22/linux-app-summit-2019-and-sugar-learning-tools/

The work goes beyond just packaging, but also doing some porting so the
experience is properly integrated into the desktop paradigm.

I still just getting started, but I am getting ready to have some GCI tasks
as well.

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:35 AM Thomas Gilliard <satellitgo at gmail.com>
wrote:

> <satellit> this is silverblue f32 1119 has Turtleblocks 220 etoys and
> labyrinth 0.6 as flatpacks
> <satellit> why cannot most of sugar apps be packaged as flatpacks?
> Google tasks? walterbender?
> <satellit> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_32#Silverblue
> <satellit> using system 76 laptop with it installed
> <satellit> #flatpack #silverblue
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20191125/6c7fbffa/attachment.html>