[Sugar-devel] Request for Comments: What's missing for a Sugar 1.0 release?
gars1029 at gmail.com
Mon May 20 18:32:34 EDT 2019
In Nicaragua, around 18K XO laptops are using Sugar 0.112, they collect and
update every laptop by the end of the school year.
In Dominican Republic 750 XO are using Sugar 0.112.
I don't know the numbers from Honduras, Costa Rica and Panama, but they
also collect and update all the laptops.
On Mon, May 20, 2019, 10:17 AM Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com> wrote:
> I'm curious how often those XO machines are updated to the latest release
> of Sugar.
> Does anyone have any estimates for how many machines are in active use and
> how many are really upgraded?
> On Mon, May 20, 2019, 3:18 AM Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net> wrote:
>> Sugar Labs are the only people on the planet who believe 0.114 > 0.98.
>> The primary requirement is that it works on all models of the XO (still by
>> far the dominant platform for Sugar). It should be documented by an update
>> to Documentation 0.106.
>> On 5/20/19 6:36 AM, Alex Perez wrote:
>> Six years and ~two months ago, way back in March of 2013, the
>> then-current SLOBs decided to make "the next release" version 1.0. This
>> didn't happen, and instead, 0.99.0 was released on 2013-06-27 instead.
>> I'd like to request that the community at-large share their opinions with
>> regards to what they feel are _must-have_ (not "nice to have") items for a
>> "Sugar 1.0" release. Please reply to this thread with your thoughts.
>> Sugar-devel mailing listSugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sugar-devel