[Sugar-devel] Request for Comments: What's missing for a Sugar 1.0 release?

[Walter Bender]

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:18 AM Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net> wrote:

> Sugar Labs are the only people on the planet who believe 0.114 > 0.98. The
> primary requirement is that it works on all models of the XO (still by far
> the dominant platform for Sugar). It should be documented by an update to
> Documentation 0.106.
>

Don't get me started. We should have gone from 0.98 to 1.00. Aaargh.

>
> Tony
>
>
> On 5/20/19 6:36 AM, Alex Perez wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Six years and ~two months ago, way back in March of 2013, the then-current
> SLOBs decided to make "the next release" version 1.0. This didn't happen,
> and instead, 0.99.0 was released on 2013-06-27 instead.
>
> See
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2013-03-21
>
> I'd like to request that the community at-large share their opinions with
> regards to what they feel are _must-have_ (not "nice to have") items for a
> "Sugar 1.0" release. Please reply to this thread with your thoughts.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing listSugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>


-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
<http://www.sugarlabs.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20190520/da4711af/attachment.html>