[Sugar-devel] GTranslator-1?

[Tony Anderson]

Thanks. At the moment I am focusing on which activities work and which 
don't. This looks like a good strategy when I get further down the trail.
I think there are probably a number of activities where we should wrap 
the upstream modules and make it easier to keep up-to-date (per GCompris).

Tony.

On 3/8/19 1:49 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Cause was Ezequiel Pereira's commit
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/GTranslator/commit/01910f94b43057252a160d027869004b0d2a3057
> which added binaries for certain systems only, with the assumption
> that those systems would have the libgtksourceview library already
> installed.
>
> You might be able to fix it by installing that library, but not if the
> library version has changed since.
>
> The v1 bundle in activities.sugarlabs.org is correct for XO-1 and
> XO-1.5 only.
>
> The only difference between the v1 bundle and the head of the master
> branch on GitHub is Ezequiel's commit.
>
> I suggest long term remove the binaries, remove all libraries except
> libsugarize, bring the shell script closer to what it was, and install
> the gtranslator package for the operating system.
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 01:18:38PM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
>> The activity GTranslator Version 1 in ASLO (dated June 30, 2010) is not the
>> same as the version in github.com/sugarlabs.
>>
>> The github version 1 - dated Jan. 27, 2016 attempts to execute correct
>> binaries for i686, Arm, and amd-64. However, it fails to start in either of
>> the first two cases: "error while loading shared libraries:
>> libgtksourceview-3.0.so.1: cannot open shared object file.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel