[Sugar-devel] why cannot most of sugar apps be packaged as flatpacks?

[Thomas Gilliard]

see: https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_32#flatpaks

On 11/25/19 5:40 AM, Martin Abente wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> I am actually working on packaging sugar apps with flatpak, and 
> publushing them in Flathub. See 
> https://blogs.gnome.org/tchx84/2019/11/22/linux-app-summit-2019-and-sugar-learning-tools/
>
> The work goes beyond just packaging, but also doing some porting so 
> the experience is properly integrated into the desktop paradigm.
>
> I still just getting started, but I am getting ready to have some GCI 
> tasks as well.
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:35 AM Thomas Gilliard <satellitgo at gmail.com 
> <mailto:satellitgo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     <satellit> this is silverblue f32 1119 has Turtleblocks 220 etoys and
>     labyrinth 0.6 as flatpacks
>     <satellit> why cannot most of sugar apps be packaged as flatpacks?
>     Google tasks? walterbender?
>     <satellit> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_32#Silverblue
>     <satellit> using system 76 laptop with it installed
>     <satellit> #flatpack #silverblue
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sugar-devel mailing list
>     Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>     <mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>     http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20191231/1d49bcf8/attachment-0001.html>