[Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

[Lionel Laské]

Hi Jake,

Didn't know Talkify but Talkify seems to rely on a backend.
Because not all our users have access to Internet (or even to a server), my
preference is to use JavaScript libraries that could work offline.
It's why Speak is better thought its quality is worse than Talkify.

Regards.

                   Lionel.

Le sam. 6 avr. 2019 à 10:48, <sugar-devel-request at lists.sugarlabs.org> a
écrit :

>
> Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 12:34:56 +0530
> From: Jake Scarlet <mmatty26 at gmail.com>
> To: James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>
> Cc: sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CALJ6_uKt-ot7r4QNM6u_LdoitX-gFDJR9t0YH7j89QV0gzvyCQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I tested the API from Speak activity. It's fine but I personally found
> https://github.com/Hagsten/Talkify to be a better option. I could also
> tweak the voice a bit to make it sound like Alice from the Python version
> of write, I've looked into the licencing and all.
> So should I use this or the one in Speak activity?
>
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 04:33, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
>
> > Look for any APIs used now in Sugarizer for text to speech, and use
> > the same?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:59:50AM +1400, Jake Scarlet wrote:
> > > Ah yes James, that's exactly what I meant to ask. Thank you all for
> your
> > > feedback.
> > > The project idea mentions that We can use an existing API based text
> > editor for
> > > the base. I've decided to go with QuillJS (one of the mentioned
> options),
> > > mainly for the flexibility and  the fact that It can be optimized to
> > such great
> > > extent. Since it isn't confined inside an iframe like many other legacy
> > > editors that i came across, I can tailor it to perfectly match the
> > Sugarizer
> > > environment.Also, the lack of any dependencies makes up for a lot of
> > > simplicity.
> > > I've tested the basic functionalities and they all match up to the
> > original
> > > python version of the Write application.
> > >
> > > Should I proceed with this?
> > > And also, what API would you recommend for the text to speech feature,
> > referred
> > > to as Alice in the python version?
> >
> > --
> > James Cameron
> > http://quozl.netrek.org/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> ----
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20190407/ad1e620d/attachment-0001.html>