[Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

Anmol Mishra anmolmishra.jiit at gmail.com
Sat Dec 8 10:48:30 EST 2018


If the factors are now tackled then it can be taken one step forward and
it's a good option.

On Sat, 8 Dec, 2018, 21:06 Alex Perez <aperez at alexperez.com wrote:

> Assuming there _was_ a resistance factor is probably not a good idea :)
> I'm not really sure why it matters, even if there was one, either.
>
> Anmol Mishra <anmolmishra.jiit at gmail.com>
> December 8, 2018 at 6:15 AM
> I would like to ask If these images are from 2010-2012, why weren't they
> deleted earlier?
> I'm asking this to get the resistance factors that were imposed earlier on
> deletion in maybe 2016-current.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>
> December 7, 2018 at 9:02 PM
> Yes.
>
> Harms are misdirection of users and filesystem size.
>
> Further subdividing;
>
> - on the misdirection, the images have bugs that have been fixed, such
> as since mitigated zero-day vulnerabilities.
>
> - on the size, they increased time cost of backups or filesystem
> maintenance on the servers.
>
> What are the gains in keeping these files?
>
> Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com>
> December 7, 2018 at 6:53 PM
> I don't see the harm in leaving old stuff lying around if the disk has
> plenty of room. Surely there's more important things to do  :)
> _______________________________________________
> Systems mailing list
> Systems at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
> James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>
> December 7, 2018 at 6:51 PM
> 61%
>
> Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com>
> December 7, 2018 at 6:39 PM
> What % of the server disk space is used?
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
> --
> Sent from Postbox
> <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20181208/1eea518c/attachment.html>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list