[Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?
Lionel Laské
lionel.laske at gmail.com
Thu Sep 14 15:49:02 EDT 2017
Hi Laurent,
James is right Sugar/sugar-web work on Sugar but is not compatible with
Sugarizer so you will have to update the sugar-web part of your app to run
it in Sugarizer.
I suggest you to use Sugarizer/sugar-web instead (just use
activities/ActivityTemplate directory as template for your application and
you will have it). This version will allow your app to work both on Sugar
and on Sugarizer.
Regards.
Lionel.
but Sugarizer/sugar-web is compliant both with Sugar and Sugarizer.
2017-09-13 12:17 GMT+02:00 <sugar-devel-request at lists.sugarlabs.org>:
>
> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:17:10 +0200
> From: laurent bernabe <laurent.bernabe at gmail.com>
> To: James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>
> Cc: Sugar Devel <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github
> repositories ?
> Message-ID:
> <CAH8mnd+XWayy_SdUaOE2fA8Qc-P+fiGWG+2iyjqRiygUCiR0ug at mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thank you,
>
> so I'll investigate into the mailing list before starting developping.
>
> 2017-09-13 12:09 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:40:34AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > > Thank you for your answer :
> > >
> > > You will need to use JavaScript and the Sugarizer sources to write
> a
> > > web activity for use with Sugarizer. I don't think Python or
> PyGame
> > > are practical for Sugarizer. Lionel would know.
> > >
> > > That's exactly what I had in mind: use Javascript and if possible an
> > AMD-Ready
> > > canvas framework.
> > >
> > >
> > > As it sounds like you will be the primary developer, best for the
> > > moment would be a repository in your own GitHub user.
> > >
> > > Ok, sounds good to me
> > >
> > >
> > > You might also work on a fork of Sugarizer in your own GitHub user.
> > >
> > > I think I don't need deploying my application on Android devices in
> > emergency :
> > > I can at least start working on the web version, so that it will be
> > > possible.
> >
> > I've seen discussions here on sugar-devel@ recently that suggested
> > Sugarizer's web activity framework had diverged from the Sugar desktop
> > framework, so take care. I don't recall the details; check the
> > mailing list archives.
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20170914/d2ed76a5/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list