[Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?
James Cameron
quozl at laptop.org
Tue Sep 12 06:15:54 EDT 2017
Sorry, I don't know which other licenses are suitable, but I know the
GNU GPL license is suitable.
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_is_the_standard_Sugar_license.3F
You might also look at licenses of other repositories in https://github.com/sugarlabs
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> Oups, sorry for the confusion : I'm not a member of sugar git yet, but
> SugarActivities Portal : [1]My profile
> Also, are all Open Source license suitable ?
>
> 2017-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[2]laurent.bernabe at gmail.com>:
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to share it on [3]http://
> github.com/sugarlabs.
> So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I think I am already a
> member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I developped my first
> activity- and take a suitable license for my source code.
>
> I'm going to check all right now.
>
> 2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[4]quozl at laptop.org>:
>
> You could host a repository in [5]http://github.com/sugarlabs if;
>
> (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or Sugarizer,
>
> (b) you are a member of the [6]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> organisation,
>
> (c) the license of the source code is consistent with Sugar Labs
> guidelines,
>
> (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit access, or want a
> central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
>
> You could host a repository in your own GitHub account if you've no
> reason to have other people push commits, or no reason to have your
> repository found in a search of [7]http://github.com/sugarlabs
>
> If it is your source code, it is your responsibility to choose. ;-)
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Hello everyone again,
> >
> > Further to my email about the problem I am facing with my activity
> icon inside
> > Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and that the Sugarizer
> problem
> > will be resolved later.
> >
> > But now I have an important point : as for the VCS system, late ago I
> used the
> > common sugar repository. Following - from far - many Sugar Devel
> emails, it
> > seems to me that it is ok to use my own repository on Github : am I
> right ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Laurent Bernabé
> >
> > [1][8]laurent.bernabe at gmail.com
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] mailto:[9]laurent.bernabe at gmail.com
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > [10]Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [11]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
> --
> James Cameron
> [12]http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Bernabé
>
> [13]laurent.bernabe at gmail.com
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Bernabé
>
> [14]laurent.bernabe at gmail.com
>
> References:
>
> [1] https://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/user/11411
> [2] mailto:laurent.bernabe at gmail.com
> [3] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [4] mailto:quozl at laptop.org
> [5] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [6] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [7] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [8] mailto:laurent.bernabe at gmail.com
> [9] mailto:laurent.bernabe at gmail.com
> [10] mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [11] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> [12] http://quozl.netrek.org/
> [13] mailto:laurent.bernabe at gmail.com
> [14] mailto:laurent.bernabe at gmail.com
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list