[Sugar-devel] ASLO activities with no repository

[James Cameron]

That's no reason to create repositories.  Repositories should be
created for source code development and maintenance, and they do not
need to be created until such time as development and maintenance
occurs.

What's wrong with using the bundles and the existing database of metadata?

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:46:25PM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Github is for developers and maintainers. This is where repositories should
> be for activities, working or not. Making the changes to get the activity to
> work are then documented and the activity can be released for publishing in
> ASLO when ready.
> 
> The purpose of the email was to determine if there is a repository already
> which should be the basis for changes and to avoid the firestorm of people
> fearing that their git history will be destroyed. Of course, there is no
> real risk since a repository from the bundle touches no one's repository.
> 
> Tony
> 
> On 05/22/2017 02:13 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> >Why create repositories?  It seems a waste of time.
> >
> >Instead, continue to use the bundles.  There is everything needed in
> >the bundle for running the activity.
> >
> >Repositories should not be made for an activity that does not work
> >with the current verson of Sugar; the activity should be ported first.
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/