[Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 103, Issue 27
lionel.laske at gmail.com
Sun May 21 05:34:43 EDT 2017
Just seen that . It seems to match with the .INI format.
Could we test it ?
2017-05-20 22:45 GMT+02:00 Lionel Laské <lionel.laske at gmail.com>:
> Thanks Chris to point it.
> I'm very interested by a way to improve L10n of Sugarizer. Specifically
> because the next version will include a tutorial so lot of new strings. It
> will be great to use Pootle to help translation.
> BTW as you know Sugarizer use the "native" file format of web10ln.js 
> for translation: .ini files.
> See for example .
> Do you think there is way to convert .ini files to Pootle then from Pootle
> to .ini files ?
> Will be happy to help on this.
> Best regards from France.
>  https://github.com/fabi1cazenave/webL10n
>  https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/blob/dev/locale.ini
>> On May 18, 2017 11:21 PM, "Chris Leonard" <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com>
>> > Have any of our Javasript / Sugarizer folks played around with
>> > xgettext-js yet?
>> > https://www.npmjs.com/package/xgettext-js
>> > If it helps us improve the L10n of Sugarizer via leveraging Pootle
>> > hosting or even just all of the hopefully similar strings already
>> > completed for corresponding Python versions of Activities in Pootle,
>> > it would possibly be a big win.
>> > cjl
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sugar-devel mailing list
>> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sugar-devel