[Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 103, Issue 27
lionel.laske at gmail.com
Sat May 20 16:45:45 EDT 2017
Thanks Chris to point it.
I'm very interested by a way to improve L10n of Sugarizer. Specifically
because the next version will include a tutorial so lot of new strings. It
will be great to use Pootle to help translation.
BTW as you know Sugarizer use the "native" file format of web10ln.js 
for translation: .ini files.
See for example .
Do you think there is way to convert .ini files to Pootle then from Pootle
to .ini files ?
Will be happy to help on this.
Best regards from France.
> On May 18, 2017 11:21 PM, "Chris Leonard" <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com>
> > Have any of our Javasript / Sugarizer folks played around with
> > xgettext-js yet?
> > https://www.npmjs.com/package/xgettext-js
> > If it helps us improve the L10n of Sugarizer via leveraging Pootle
> > hosting or even just all of the hopefully similar strings already
> > completed for corresponding Python versions of Activities in Pootle,
> > it would possibly be a big win.
> > cjl
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sugar-devel