[Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 103, Issue 27

[Lionel Laské]

Thanks Chris to point it.

I'm very interested by a way to improve L10n of Sugarizer. Specifically
because the next version will include a tutorial so lot of new strings. It
will be great to use Pootle to help translation.

BTW as you know Sugarizer use the "native" file format of web10ln.js [1]
for translation: .ini files.
See for example [2].
Do you think there is way to convert .ini files to Pootle then from Pootle
to .ini files ?

Will be happy to help on this.

Best regards from France.

           Lionel.

[1] https://github.com/fabi1cazenave/webL10n
[2] https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/blob/dev/locale.ini




> On May 18, 2017 11:21 PM, "Chris Leonard" <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Have any of our Javasript / Sugarizer folks played around with
> > xgettext-js  yet?
> >
> > https://www.npmjs.com/package/xgettext-js
> >
> > If it helps us improve the L10n of Sugarizer via leveraging Pootle
> > hosting or even just all of the hopefully similar strings already
> > completed for corresponding Python versions of Activities in Pootle,
> > it would possibly be a big win.
> >
> > cjl
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20170520/5a3484d3/attachment.html>