[Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/sugar-build] run command showing too many errors and warnings in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (#49)

[James Cameron]

But that's pretty much what it says; you must have missed it on the
page.

For Sugar, "Send us a link to a pull request or merge request
you have made on a Sugar or Sugar activity bug."

And for Sugarizer "Using instructions here develop your first
Sugar-Web activity Send us a screenshot of your new activity executed
in Sugarizer".

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 09:46:50AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Agreed.
> 
> Personally, I would like to see a candidate invited to create,
> enhance, or document an activity. At one point there was an effort
> to provide a toolbar help button but, for some reason, that seems to
> have faded.
> 
> Tony
> 
> On 04/26/2017 09:38 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> >No, the requirement isn't mandatory; there's alternative requirements,
> >see
> >https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/Template#Miscellaneous
> >
> >Also, we've since greatly simplified "development environment" to
> >include native packaged Sugar, which is not a substitute.
> >
> >On the other hand, candidates need to prove their capability somehow;
> >sugar-build was once a useful substitute for examinations, and if they
> >are going to contribute to Sugar through code development it was a good
> >challenge.
> >
> >However, our previous candidates are having a lot of problems figuring
> >out how to fix sugar-build, and this makes;
> >
> >- the native packaged Sugar environment; and,
> >
> >- the alternative requirements (pull requests or Sugarizer),
> >
> >much more useful than before.
> >
> >In the end, this is up to Walter as responsible contact.
> >
> >On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 06:50:59AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> >>Yeah!
> >>
> >>Now if we could only get the GSOC invitations to stop requiring candidates to
> >>build a 'development environment' and ask them to use Sugar., not a sugar
> >>substitute.
> >>
> >>Tony
> >>
> >>On 04/26/2017 04:44 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> >>
> >>     [1]@iamutkarshtiwari, certainly not. Fix sugar-build, not sugar.
> >>     sugar-build is only an emulator, and is not used very much at all. sugar is
> >>     used by the most people.
> >>
> >>     —
> >>     You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> >>     Reply to this email directly, [2]view it on GitHub, or [3]mute the thread.*
> >>
> >>References:
> >>
> >>[1] https://github.com/iamutkarshtiwari
> >>[2] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/issues/49#issuecomment-297159303
> >>[3] https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAULkt75KJJrcz9o3og71gcYeOqzV92Iks5rzltEgaJpZM4MmBhE
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Sugar-devel mailing list
> >>Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >>http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/