[Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/sugar-build] run command showing too many errors and warnings in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (#49)
quozl at laptop.org
Tue Apr 25 21:38:31 EDT 2017
No, the requirement isn't mandatory; there's alternative requirements,
Also, we've since greatly simplified "development environment" to
include native packaged Sugar, which is not a substitute.
On the other hand, candidates need to prove their capability somehow;
sugar-build was once a useful substitute for examinations, and if they
are going to contribute to Sugar through code development it was a good
However, our previous candidates are having a lot of problems figuring
out how to fix sugar-build, and this makes;
- the native packaged Sugar environment; and,
- the alternative requirements (pull requests or Sugarizer),
much more useful than before.
In the end, this is up to Walter as responsible contact.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 06:50:59AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Now if we could only get the GSOC invitations to stop requiring candidates to
> build a 'development environment' and ask them to use Sugar., not a sugar
> On 04/26/2017 04:44 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> @iamutkarshtiwari, certainly not. Fix sugar-build, not sugar.
> sugar-build is only an emulator, and is not used very much at all. sugar is
> used by the most people.
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.*
>  https://github.com/iamutkarshtiwari
>  https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/issues/49#issuecomment-297159303
>  https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAULkt75KJJrcz9o3og71gcYeOqzV92Iks5rzltEgaJpZM4MmBhE
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the Sugar-devel