[Sugar-devel] Activities added to GithHub

[Tony Anderson]

Hi Walter,

On github as far as I can tell, the developer is only acknowledged as a 
contributor. So the loss of this information seems a byproduct of the 
move to github. I would appreciate advice as how the developer can be 
promoted short of them becoming a contributor and making some update to 
an activity.

Tony

On 04/23/2017 09:24 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> Tony,
>
> I can not speak for every contributor, but there is a lot more to 
> contributing to a project than the end result. Many contributors take 
> pride in their contributions and these days, one's GitHub 
> contributions have value in the job market. A wholesale removal of the 
> git history by Sugar Labs does not send a very welcoming message to 
> past or future contributors. On a more mundane level, the lack of 
> history means as a developer I have no way of knowing whom to ask for 
> help.
>
> -walter
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net 
> <mailto:tony_anderson at usa.net>> wrote:
>
>     The process for installing repositories requires that the target
>     repository be empty.
>
>     I would appreciate someone who could itemize what needs to be in a
>     repository such as the license, .gitignore, README.md, and so on.
>     Much of that can probably be done by a script using the
>     information available from ASLO.
>
>     My sense is that PRs are appropriate for changes to an activities
>     functions (such as a port to gtk3) but not for housekeeping.
>
>     Tony
>
>     On 04/23/2017 07:27 AM, Love Mehta wrote:
>>     There are many activities lacking a description at
>>     https://github.com/sugar-activities/ and it is hard to know the
>>     name and purpose of the activity specially in the web activities
>>     where one has to open the index.html file. I think we should add
>>     the descriptions from https://activities.sugarlabs.org for each
>>     activity to the readme markdown file. I thought of doing this but
>>     this will lead to a large number of pull requests. Should I go
>>     ahead with it?
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20170423/63ccedb0/attachment-0001.html>