[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)
Walter Bender
walter.bender at gmail.com
Wed May 18 16:25:24 EDT 2016
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Sean DALY <sdaly.be at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Fortunately, SLOBs votes are done via email, at any time, and the
>>> monthly SLOBs meetings are there to unjam any backlogs.
>>
>>
>>
>> ah I was under the impression that motions were debated and voted in the
>> meetings, with recourse to e-mail when meeting time ran out after debate
>> but before a vote.
>>
>> Nobody's in thrall to a higher power here, and if the SFC requires every
>> single expenditure to be voted, there is a reason, and perhaps the reason
>> isn't valid. With resources limited as they are, we need to be vigilant
>> about bureaucracy, that's all.
>>
>> Speaking of which, the SLOBs may wish to consider a motion numbering
>> system such as is used by legislatures. It could simplify referencing
>> previous decisions, in particular providing a search engine handle which
>> could be used to reconcile authorized expenditures. And motions could be
>> more easily listed for governance history.
>>
>
> Nice idea. I could start by numbering the motions listed in [1].
>
>
Done.
> -walter
>
>>
>>
>> Sean
>>
>>
> [1] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>
--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
<http://www.sugarlabs.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20160518/c4c05f86/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list