[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

[Caryl Bigenho]

Hi all...
I finally had a chance to check out the discussions about the motions I have proposed. Unfortunately I don't really have the chance to do much commenting as I am restricted to communicating with my I phone for a while. 

After a great 10 days in WA and going to LinuxFestNW (on our own dime), we got home and Ed started having dizzy spells. After a lot of testing, it has been decided that the time to get a pacemaker has come. So, if all goes according to plan, it will be implanted this evening and he will get to go home about 24 hours later.

That means I will miss tomorrow's meeting. If I need to add anything to the motion or discussion before it comes up for vote... Send an email to this thread.

Caryl

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 3, 2016, at 6:44 AM, Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 3 May 2016 at 09:37, Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Why does the vision statement say "but not phones"? I run Sugarizer on my iPhone and Ed's Android phone. There are some formatting issues but they are easily overcome. In the real world of developing countries, children are probably more likely to have access to one of these tiny screens than any tablet or computer. They deserve access to Sugar too.
> 
> I added that because when I tested it seemed to not work well, but I don't object to removing it and have just done so :) 
> 
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Vision_proposal_2016&diff=98338&oldid=98337
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20160505/3618a13c/attachment.html>