[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Tony Anderson]

Thanks for the reply.

I subscribed to the list because there seemed to be a lot of sugar 
activity. I have been dismayed by the
frequent threats to drop Sugar or a critical component. At one point, 
the messages suggested that the
automated testing scripts could not even read the license text at the 
beginning of a module.

Tony

On 06/24/2016 12:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Tony!
>
> First of all: Thanks for your interest in Debian packaging of Sugar!
>
> Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 08:25:07)
>> Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar
>> in one package?
>> What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1?
>> Does this one package
>> include the essential activities? Does it include both sugar and sugar3?
> That warning - and your questions here - are specific to the Debian
> packaging of Sugar.
>
> Possibly https://wiki.debian.org/Sugar already answers your questions -
> else feel free to ask such questions at our mailinglist referenced at
> that wiki page.
>
>
>   - Jonas
>
> P.S. If you received the warning email through some Sugarlabs list, then
> someone has subscribed that list to receive automated messages from
> Debian, which is bad: Don't tell robots to receive robot-generated
> messages aimed at human.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20160624/640721c3/attachment.html>