[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] A Better Idea...

[Tony Anderson]

Hi Dave,

I suspect we will continue to disagree. I believe the actions of the 
board have been clear and made in public.

I don't think your unhappiness with the Board relates to procedures. It 
appears to be based on actions which you think the
board should have taken, but didn't.

Tony

On 06/19/2016 05:03 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 19 June 2016 at 06:08, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net 
> <mailto:tony_anderson at usa.net>> wrote:
>
>
>     What is the issue?
>
>
> Effectiveness.
>
>     The normal procedure is to make a motion, have it seconded, and
>     then vote.
>     If it lacks a second, it means the SLOBs do not believe it it
>     ready for consideration.
>
>
> When SLOB's consideration has not occurred in a way that is visible to 
> the community then it has not occurred at all.
>
>     If it fails to receive four votes, it means the SLOBs do not
>     approve the motion.
>     In both cases, the SLOBs have taken action on the motion.
>     In my limited experience on the board, this seems to be working
>     quite well.
>
>
> I can only disagree in the strongest terms that this is working well.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20160619/73d1dce3/attachment.html>