[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] A Better Idea...

[Dave Crossland]

On 19 June 2016 at 06:08, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net> wrote:

>
> What is the issue?
>

Effectiveness.


> The normal procedure is to make a motion, have it seconded, and then vote.
> If it lacks a second, it means the SLOBs do not believe it it ready for
> consideration.
>

When SLOB's consideration has not occurred in a way that is visible to the
community then it has not occurred at all.


> If it fails to receive four votes, it means the SLOBs do not approve the
> motion.
> In both cases, the SLOBs have taken action on the motion.
> In my limited experience on the board, this seems to be working quite well.


I can only disagree in the strongest terms that this is working well.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20160619/feb4e38e/attachment.html>