[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] A Better Idea...

[Tony Anderson]

Hi, Dave

What is the issue?

The normal procedure is to make a motion, have it seconded, and then vote.

If it lacks a second, it means the SLOBs do not believe it it ready for 
consideration.

If it fails to receive four votes, it means the SLOBs do not approve the 
motion.

In both cases, the SLOBs have taken action on the motion.

In my limited experience on the board, this seems to be working quite well.

Tony

On 06/18/2016 10:54 PM, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
>             That said and according to current SLOBs requirements,
>             SLOBs approval will get a long tale as according to
>             current motions system it requires that (A) each
>             disbursement motion gets to be seconded by one SLOB + (B)
>             the motion gets 4 affirmative votes.
>
>
>     I agree that this is a problem; and that is why I proposed motions
>     that would structure SLOB meetings in a way that increases their
>     effectiveness.
>
> Good start. I hope current SLOBs get to analyze the issue ;D

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20160619/945bd82d/attachment.html>