[Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [Sur] [IAEP] [SLOB] Motion (1 of 2) GSoC Stipends

[Lionel Laské]

-1

I'm considering that, like in others GSoC organization, all GSoC funds from
Google must stay at SugarLabs.

           Lionel.

P.S.: I'm concerning about the increasing of number of motions. I'm not
sure we need motion for everything. Lot of initiatives could be launched
without any motion. We're at the point where we're doing motions to manage
motions ! Do I need to propose a motion to stop doing motions ?
Hopefully I've not asked a motion three years ago to start the Sugarizer
initiative...


2016-06-08 2:16 GMT+02:00 Andres Aguirre <aaguirre at fing.edu.uy>:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:40 PM, José Miguel García <
> josemiguel at argos.edu.uy> wrote:
>
>> Motion regarding GSoC mentoring stipends
>>
>> Motion: Whereas it is the general policy of Sugar Labs to retain all GSoC
>> mentoring stipends in the General Fund, if a mentor asks a GSoC Admin (for
>> example in 2016, Walter or Lionel) to pay a stipend to a mentor, their
>> share of the stipend amount will be disbursed without further motions to
>> approve the spending. The share is calculated from the total awarded for
>> the GSoC slot by Google, minus 10% (as all Sugar Labs income is donated to
>> Software Freedom Conservancy for organisational services), minus 5%
>> (retained for Sugar Labs General Funds),  divided by the number of mentors
>> for the project. For example, in a year with 6 slots and 10 mentors at
>> $500, the total revenue is $3,000; 10% for Conservancy is $300 and 5% for
>> Sugar Labs is $150, leaving a total of $2,550 or $255 per mentor.
>>
>> +1 para secundar la moción
>> +1 para aprobarla
>>
>>
>> ___________________
>> Lic. José Miguel García
>> Montevideo - Uruguay
>>
>> 2016-06-06 11:47 GMT-03:00 Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> +1 from me as well
>>>
>>> (I had reclused myself from voting on the earlier version of this motion
>>> due to a conflict of interest in that I am a potential recipient of the
>>> funds, but since I have said that I will not accept the funds for my
>>> personal use, I think it is OK to vote.)
>>>
>>> -walter
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Claudia Urrea <claudia at laptop.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> + 1
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I second the motion and approve it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tony
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/04/2016 03:02 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We did not have time to take action on two motions at yesterday's
>>>>> meeting. Please review the motion below. If an oversight board seconds the
>>>>> motion, then we can bring it up for a vote by email.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards.
>>>>>
>>>>> -walter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Motion regarding GSoC mentoring stipends
>>>>>
>>>>> Motion: Whereas it is the general policy of Sugar Labs to retain all
>>>>> GSoC mentoring stipends in the General Fund, if a mentor asks a GSoC Admin
>>>>> (for example in 2016, Walter or Lionel) to pay a stipend to a mentor, their
>>>>> share of the stipend amount will be disbursed without further motions to
>>>>> approve the spending. The share is calculated from the total awarded for
>>>>> the GSoC slot by Google, minus 10% (as all Sugar Labs income is donated to
>>>>> Software Freedom Conservancy for organisational services), minus 5%
>>>>> (retained for Sugar Labs General Funds),  divided by the number of mentors
>>>>> for the project. For example, in a year with 6 slots and 10 mentors at
>>>>> $500, the total revenue is $3,000; 10% for Conservancy is $300 and 5% for
>>>>> Sugar Labs is $150, leaving a total of $2,550 or $255 per mentor.
>>>>>
>>>>> ----
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that an earlier version of this motion failed:
>>>>>
>>>>> Failed Motion
>>>>>
>>>>> Motion: To allow the mentors participating in Google Summer of Code to
>>>>> disperse the mentor stipend among themselves as they see fit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Further discussion of this motion can be found beginning at [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2016-May/018130.html
>>>>> --
>>>>> Walter Bender
>>>>> Sugar Labs
>>>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sugar-devel mailing listSugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Claudia Urrea, PhD
>>>> OLPCA
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Walter Bender
>>> Sugar Labs
>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lista olpc-Sur
>> olpc-Sur at lists.laptop.org
>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-sur
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SLOBs mailing list
> SLOBs at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20160608/f44fc690/attachment.html>