[Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3] Save As Popup (#327)

[Tony Anderson]

As you might expect, I totally disagree.

First, by that time the damage has been done. Either the 'save as' 
option has been taken with a new object created or the 'resumed' 
document has been overwritten - as at present.

This feature has two objectives:

     1 - require Journal items to have a name supplied by user
     2 - enable the user to choose whether to save the object as a new 
one or to simply save the modified document.

This proposal addresses neither objective.

You are not going to change your point of view so the only solution I 
can see is to provide a gsetting option so that users and deployments 
can decide on how they want this to work.

Re: the screenshot. Help me - as I remember this dialog was modal and 
required an entry in the description area - leaving the title as 'Write 
activity' was ok.
This was to implement Walter's desire that the description serve as the 
message does in git.

Tony

On 07/15/2016 04:36 AM, Sebastian Silva wrote:
>
> As promised here's a screenshot of Sugar 0.92's "save as" dialog:
> captura de pantalla de 2016-07-14 21-33-17 
> <https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/199755/16861909/cc262c7c-4a0a-11e6-8ebd-88c4a5157595.png>
>
> As per our meeting today I think Martin Dengler's proposal to land the 
> user in the Journal after quitting with focus on Object Title would be 
> a good solution.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub 
> <https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/327#issuecomment-232845789>, 
> or mute the thread 
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAULkhTztLdY3u833M4V3dte_sV3q3RMks5qVvISgaJpZM4JEg63>.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20160715/4b227cba/attachment.html>