[Sugar-devel] [GSOC] Font Editor Next Steps

[Yash Agarwal]

On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 6:11 PM Sam Parkinson <sam.parkinson3 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Yash Agarwal <agrwal.ysh94 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Work report
> I worked on the following issues:
> Adding support for ufoz format
> Adding git submodules
> The editor has been integrated with the activity
>
> I'll begin adding the features for manipulating the bezier curves over the
> weekend
> I'll make the complete week report on Sunday
>
> A question to ponder upon:
> Should we make 2 separate activities
> A font manager
> A font editor
> The manager will have root access and be integrated into sugars glucose
> module (correct me if I'm wrong) so that it's there with the pre installed
> activities
> The editor will be separate and will only deal in ufoz /ufo format
>
> Hi Yash,
>
> Why do we need root to install fonts?  Can't you just manage the fonts in
> "~/.fonts" and call the rest of the fonts system fonts.  We really
> shouldn't make it easy for users to delete system fonts - it will annoy the
> package manager and it will probably break applications.  We don't want
> users thinking "I don't use Deja Vu Sans" and then having a very odd
> looking Sugar because they uninstalled the font we use in the UI.
>
> Yeah, this is questioning how much power a user should have system fonts ?
many OS grant full control ex. Ubuntu and many others
so may be a discussion can take place at the next irc meet? or on a
separate thread?


> Maybe it would be best to add a control panel for fonts?  Activities must
> have state, and write something to the journal.  Control panels don't have
> to write a state to the journal.  Control panels are "extensions" in sugar
> terms, meaning they are loaded from either
> "/usr/share/sugar/extensions/cpsection/" or
> "~/.sugar/$SUGAR_PROFILE/extensions".  This means that you could include
> the font control panel extension with your app, and then install it on your
> app's first run.
>
> This looks good, I'll look into it :)


> Thanks,
> Sam
>



>
>
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 21:28 Dave Crossland, <dave at lab6.com> wrote:
>
>> Great stuff Yash!
>>
>> The blog needs a bit of attention...
>>
>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/edit-fonts-activity/commit/cbdfaf2a2c5320ac417124ebd050087588cd4e6c
>> is posted 10 days ago, but it wasnt on a friday, which is when we have
>> to check in with walter, so I renamed it to
>> https://sugarlabs.github.io/edit-fonts-activity/bezier-editing-works
>>
>> However, you've then duplicated this file and appended to it -
>> https://sugarlabs.github.io/edit-fonts-activity/week-5-work - so that
>> its the same at the top
>>
>> Please remove duplicate content :)
>>
>> Also
>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/edit-fonts-activity/blob/gh-pages/_posts/2016-06-28-week-5-work_wip.md
>> seems to be not needed, so I made a PR to remove it,
>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/edit-fonts-activity/pull/47
>>
>> Since (a) you can set a post to not be published if you want to draft
>> it on gh-pages, and (b) you can draft it in a git branch and only
>> merge it when its ready, I suggest not creating such WIP files in
>> future :) I have been trying to make blog posts with the  (b) process
>> but (a) is also fine, as you did in
>>
>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/edit-fonts-activity/commit/6507a9efbb266d31deadd3d4fccf5f190e6f8af0
>> :)
>>
>> Secondly, the filename of a Jekyll post must be unique after the date,
>> so I made a PR to rename the latest features checklist,
>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/edit-fonts-activity/pull/48
>>
>> Please do review and merge these when you can :)
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20160702/6c3a8a03/attachment.html>