[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

[Tony Anderson]

I use Jukebox 26 to enable continued use of gstreamer 0.1. So far I have 
been unable to determine how to add codecs to gstreamer 1.0. As best I 
can determine you must add all of bad and ugly instead of adding 
selected codecs. Given the limited storage available on the XO, this 
seems to be unnecessary bloat.

Tony

On 12/08/2016 12:45 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> I have never been able to figure out how to get samples from GS1.0 the 
> way I get them from GS0.1 so I never updated measure. Any tips most 
> welcome.
>
> I did have a GS1.0 version of Record kicking around at one point but 
> it didn't take advantage of some OLPC XO features so it was never 
> accepted. I can try to resurrect that code.
>
> -walter
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com 
> <mailto:pbrobinson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     FYI. We'll likely need these converted over in the F-26 cycle or drop
>     them. I think the hardest to migrate would be record.
>
>     sugar-clock
>     sugar-memorize
>     sugar-record
>     sugar-speak
>
>
>     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>     From: Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com <mailto:mike at cchtml.com>>
>     Date: Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:06 PM
>     Subject: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10
>     To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>     <devel at lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
>
>
>     Hi,
>
>     As I'm sure everyone is well aware gstreamer-0.10 is obsolete and has
>     been replaced by gstreamer-1.0. An upstream release for gst-0.10 has
>     not been made in over 4 years. Last month there were a handful of
>     security vulnerabilities disclosed[1] and upstream no longer maintains
>     the 0.10 series. While we could patch and update our Fedora packages
>     this is a perfect opportunity to retire it.
>
>     Here is an approximate list of packages depending on gst-0.10. They
>     themselves should be considered obsolete or retirement material as
>     their upstreams may not have adopted gst-1.0. If the package doesn't
>     have a gst-1.0 equivalent there may be some cases where we could patch
>     in support for gst-1.0. Are there any non-Fedora software that would
>     prevent retirement from being possible?
>
>     anchorman
>     banshee-community-extensions
>     bigloo-libs
>     clutter-gst
>     compat-wxGTK3-gtk2-media
>     drawtk
>     evas-generic-loaders
>     flumotion
>     gcompris
>     gloobus-preview
>     gnome-mud
>     gnomebaker
>     gstreamer-devel
>     gstreamer-ffmpeg
>     gstreamer-plugins-bad
>     gstreamer-plugins-bad-free
>     gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras
>     gstreamer-plugins-base
>     gstreamer-plugins-base-tools
>     gstreamer-plugins-good
>     gstreamer-plugins-good-extras
>     gstreamer-plugins-ugly
>     gstreamer-python
>     gstreamer-rtsp
>     gstreamer-rtsp-python
>     gstreamermm
>     gstreamermm-devel
>     ignuit
>     iptux
>     libgnome-media-profiles
>     libnice-gstreamer
>     lordsawar
>     media-explorer
>     moodbar
>     oggconvert
>     perl-GStreamer
>     perl-GStreamer-Interfaces
>     player
>     pocketsphinx-plugin
>     presence
>     psimedia
>     qt-mobility-multimediakit
>     sap
>     subtitleeditor
>     vagalume
>     winswitch
>     wxGTK-media
>     wxGTK3-media
>     xfce4-mixer
>     xfce4-volumed
>
>     Thank you,
>     Michael
>
>     [1]
>     https://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2016/11/0day-exploit-advancing-exploitation.html
>     <https://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2016/11/0day-exploit-advancing-exploitation.html>
>     _______________________________________________
>     devel mailing list -- devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>     To unsubscribe send an email to
>     devel-leave at lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:devel-leave at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sugar-devel mailing list
>     Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>     <mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>     http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>     <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20161208/6a59432c/attachment-0001.html>