[Sugar-devel] Sugar-Server enhancement
James Cameron
quozl at laptop.org
Fri Apr 15 20:08:17 EDT 2016
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 05:26:37AM +0530, Manash Raja wrote:
> @James,
>
> 1. you're changing "Register" and "Register again" to "Connect to
> server", but it isn't clear in the commit message why it is necessary;
>
> I felt as "Register" refers to an action done for first time (Add new laptop
> entry in the server), while "Register again" means to redo the same thing (Add
> another entry of the same laptop in the server). But now as registration is
> done only once, while at other times, Sugar only changes a few setting to
> adapt. Hence I felt to keep a constant name "Connect to server" as it does not
> bother the user if he/she if connecting to the server for the first time or
> otherwise, as things are taken care of in the background. Just gave a thought.
> Nevertheless, it also just say "Register" always.
I see.
>
> please avoid `ssh-keygen -R` if server is unchanged, because
> otherwise a rogue server can be introduced after registration,
>
> (Would it be possible to change .ssh/config to add an entry for each
> server? If so, the known_hosts file might not need changing at all).
>
> I don't know much about the ssh host verification though, but I am learning it
> and will come up with something better. We can edit the .ssh/config file as it
> doesn't require root permission. Can you tell me what entry would be there for
> each server and do we just have to keep adding or we will have to manage it
> also?
To see the parameters, see "man ssh_config".
Some parameters are new since ds-backup was written.
An entry for the first registered server might look like;
Host server-1
HostName schoolserver
UserKnownHostsFile ~/.ssh/known_hosts_server_1
As a result, no need to alter the ~/.ssh/known_hosts file.
>
> please check for `os.command()` failure, which could happen if the
> disk is full,
>
> Do you mean 'os.system(command)'?
Yes, sorry, typo.
>
> please add commit message references to the server-side changes
> and invite [1]server-devel at lists.laptop.org people with your feature page
> and patch.
>
> I didn't do any modification to the server side for this. Just setup the server
> with "Services for XO laptops ...." enabled in the schoolserver admin page.
> Though I have added this to my commit message. Updated commit message: [2]
> https://github.com/ManashRaja/sugar/commit/
> 3ad4d847d0f2373d5bfe9f6c8e201b358f3f68e0
Thanks.
> @Jerry,
> I haven't modified anything for this feature on the server side. I found that
> it uses both idmgr and xs-authserver. But the 5000 port is used by
> xs-authserver to display a list of registered laptops. I didn't enable it
> myself, it was there. All I did was to setup my server according to the
> instructions and enabled the "XO register" feature from the admin page.
>
> @Tony,
> Can you tell me how ownCloud is supported by XSCE? I saw it in the services
> ready to be enabled. So can we not move the storage location of /library/user/
> <some_id> inside or account based user directories to the cloud storage
> locations.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Jerry Vonau <[3]me at jvonau.ca> wrote:
>
>
> > On April 15, 2016 at 4:18 PM Manash Raja <[4]mpdmanash at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I fixed the bug. I haven't created a PR just yet.
> > [5]https://github.com/ManashRaja/sugar/commit/
> 660985d2183416cd3ed758095e92adf82f87a10c
> > As of now I am parsing HTML data for json data to look for registered
> > laptops at an XS from the webaddress [6]http://schoolserver:5000 that
> serves
> > a
> > liist of registered laptops.
>
> Interesting, 'idmgr' doesn't use port 5000, are you using 'authserver' on
> the XSCE? Little background, idmgr was released by OLPC while authserver
> originates from ActivityCentral's dextrose work. I have no knowledge of
> which method was deployed by what deployment the XSCE project tries to
> cover all deployments' needs, that is why both are present. Better check
> with Walter about using dextrose code, that might be frowned upon.
>
> > I will modify it if there is another better method that can be
> > implemented
> > from the Sugar side (we don't intend to modify the server side I guess).
> >
>
> Think you better plan to work on the server side also, you'll have a clean
> slate to work with.
>
> > And here is the feature page as suggested by James.
> > [7]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_XS-server_registration
> >
> > Please have a look.
> >
> > I am very excited to be a part of the discussions that go into the making
> > of great features that can affect people down there in deployment. :)
> > There
> > is a scope to do so much.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
> Jerry
>
> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:32 AM, James Cameron <[8]quozl at laptop.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:02:39PM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> > > > Hi, James
> > > >
> > > > This thread was getting long so I replied only to the most recent
> > > > communication. I am sure you have the full thread which shows the
> > > > scope of the discussion.
> > >
> > > You're making it longer, yes, by hijacking it. You can find the full
> > > thread here:
> > >
> > > [9]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2016-April/
> thread.html
> > >
> > > > According to trac bug #362 was opened seven years ago against 0.82
> > > > and last looked at three years ago. Several competent people looked
> > > > at it and left comments. I see none that signify consensus.
> > >
> > > I take it that you don't want Manash to fix this bug, thanks.
> > >
> > > I'd like it fixed. I think there are others who want it fixed. It
> > > would probably help with XS testing as well.
> > >
> > > > To have a design discussion, it is valuable to have a proposed
> > > > design.
> > > >
> > > > I have tried to explain my proposal in detail. If there are
> > > > questions, I would be happy to try to respond. Fixing the 'Journal
> > > > is Full' dialog is a major help. However, what do you recommend to
> > > > deployments when this happens?
> > >
> > > 1. upgrade to Sugar 0.108 (by RPM or images), or backport the patch
> > > [#9623, #1720] into your custom builds,
> > >
> > > 2. transcode content to play in browser not Journal,
> > >
> > > 3. delete any activities that are not needed,
> > >
> > > 4. deploy Sugar Network to use the network activity cache,
> > >
> > > Also delete the Browse temporary directories, you reported this on
> > > 19th January, it remains a problem, and you refused to test my fix, so
> > > I lost interest very rapidly. [#4931]
> > >
> > > > The bottom line is that a reasonably active user is likely to need
> > > > more room to store her Journal than is available on the XO.
> > >
> > > No, because it's no longer a significant problem. XO-1 are in the
> > > minority and getting rarer as they die. Those that haven't died have
> > > SD cards.
> > >
> > > > In the Journal code a filled star sets the 'keep' flag in the
> > > > metadata. The cleared star clears the 'keep' flag in the metadata.
> > > > Using this feature greatly simplifies the coding and the Journal
> > > > view. As far as I know, the only use of this at the moment is to
> > > > support the Portfolio activity.
> > >
> > > You are using an implementation detail in describing the flag. The
> > > name given to the flag in documentation and user interface is
> > > "favorite" (sic).
> > >
> > > > I think the detail view is inappropriate exactly as it would be to
> > > > move the multiple selection checkbox there. These controls need to
> > > > be immediately available.
> > >
> > > I disagree; they won't get used, and so it would be a waste of
> > > valuable vertical space. The reason the checkbox won't get used is;
> > >
> > > - most laptops don't have a server,
> > >
> > > - an LRU algorithm can maintain the cache effectively.
> > >
> > > > The 'backup/sync' script is a good place to do check storage quotas
> > > > because the script needs to touch the datastore on a regular basis.
> > > > It has access to the amount of store in use and the LRU information.
> > > > For example, if the user wants a document downloaded, the script
> > > > knows its size and whether some other local copies need to be
> > > > deleted to make room.
> > >
> > > I disagree. This script runs infrequently. The LRU must be
> > > implemented inside the datastore for it to function properly.
> > > Otherwise the lag between user action and response by the script would
> > > be too long.
> > >
> > > > While an implementation detail, so far no change has been necessary
> > > > to the datastore class.
> > >
> > > That's no reason not to change it.
> > >
> > > > Actually, since the 'keep' or favorite star sets the metadata,
> > > > so far there has been no need to change the Journal.
> > >
> > > That's no reason not to change it.
> > >
> > > > "The multiple user feature is supported by Fedora and Sugar, but we
> > > > removed it for OLPC OS."
> > > >
> > > > I think I am beginning to understand. OLPC OS is your generic name
> > > > for the images to be installed on each model of the XO.
> > >
> > > Really, you are out of touch! OLPC OS is our name for the operating
> > > system releases on the XO laptop. We've been using the term at OLPC
> > > for a very long time, and use it in each release announcement.
> > >
> > > > I am deploying build 13.2.5 with Sugar 0.106 on all models.
> > >
> > > That's so sad. It was released in July 2015. It has the journal full
> > > bug you mentioned. I'm not interested in supporting that release,
> > > because I've already released two others. Upgrade.
> > >
> > > > So you are saying that we, users of Sugar or ' OLPC OS' could have a
> > > > multiple user version of Sugar if 'you', as developers, didn't
> > > > remove it.
> > >
> > > Well done.
> > >
> > > > As I understand it, you propose to generate unique serial-numbers
> > > > per user.
> > >
> > > No. I was describing what happens _now_ during registration, by
> > > reference to the code:
> > >
> > > 1. for XO laptops the serial number of the laptop is used,
> > >
> > > 2. for non-XO laptops a serial number is generated randomly,
> > >
> > > 3. there is no attempt to ensure the random serial number is
> > > unique, but the width of the random string is sufficient to make it
> > > unlikely,
> > >
> > > > So SSO would be guaranteed since no two users could have
> > > > the same serial-number. This would certainly work and probably
> > > > involve very little change to the existing code. What will be needed
> > > > is a 'dns' to map serial-numbers to usernames.
> > >
> > > No, I wasn't proposing that. It's your idea. I don't think it's
> > > guaranteed to be unique though.
> > >
> > > > Every school I have worked with keeps a careful record of students
> > > > (often in paper ledgers). Currently I provide a name record in a
> > > > Django database on the server (along with an XO inventory by serial
> > > > number).
> > >
> > > Fail to see relevance. Not all schools will or can do this.
> > >
> > > > Agreed that determining which Journal objects need to be saved to
> > > > the school server is not a difficult problem. However, datastore is
> > > > a class so each user's datastore and the common datastore would be
> > > > instances. So this seemed like a simple thing to implement.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, The deletion of Journal objects without an associated
> > > > document works amazingly well. The number of objects in the Journal
> > > > view goes from hundreds to only a few (often less than 20).
> > > > Moreover, these 20 are the obviously interesting ones. Nothing is
> > > > lost as the metadata is saved to the school server. It becomes much
> > > > easier to 'reflect' when you are only looking at the documents you
> > > > created. Meanwhile the myriad of objects can be subject to
> > > > statistical analysis.
> > > >
> > > > For many activities, such as the Terminal, the document saved is
> > > > actually 'state' information. This allows the Terminal activity to
> > > > be restored with tabs and pwd. There are many game activities such
> > > > as Memorize that also store state. It would seem more appropriate to
> > > > save this state information in the metadata. For example, a json
> > > > could be created in the metadata to hold state information. The
> > > > script could keep these objects to enable the user to resume.
> > >
> > > Your concept of metadata is not of interest to me; journal objects
> > > must continue reflect the learner's use of the laptop if the journal
> > > is to meet the designed style of reflection.
> > >
> > > Unreflecting adults are not the target user.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Tony
> > > >
> > > > On 04/15/2016 01:36 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> > > > >On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:25:59AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> > > > >>Hi Manash
> > > > >>
> > > > >>The registration process is awkward but not the problem.
> > > > >This is unfair scope creep. Manash began by asking about bug #362
> > > > >and
> > > > >has been working to fix that. Now you're asking him to consider a
> > > > >much larger task; not a coding task, but a redesign of Sugar Journal
> > > > >and Backup interaction. This is huge.
> > > > >
> > > > >And as far as I can tell, students aren't even accepted yet [1].
> > > > >
> > > > >1. [10]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code#2016
> > > > >
> > > > >What you propose is from a set of tasks [2] you added to the Wiki,
> > > > >which have not undergone any design review according to Sugar Labs
> > > > >design practice and feature policy. I do not see any consensus on
> > > > >these; we're yet to build a consensus.
> > > > >
> > > > >2.
> > > [11]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2016#
> Sugar_on_the_Ground
> > > > >
> > > > >Or, it looks like you're trying to make your own fork of Sugar,
> > > > >which
> > > > >I'm fine with, it's open source after all, but to push that on
> > > > >others
> > > > >without their input is wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > >If you proceed without consensus as a sole designer, then OLPC will
> > > > >fork Sugar (as we already have so that XO-1s will go faster), and
> > > > >you'll be making your own builds.
> > > > >
> > > > >>The problem is that rsync is used to create backups of the Journal
> > > > >>and no effective means is offered to restore.
> > > > >Agreed. We have no restore from server feature in Sugar 0.108,
> > > > >along
> > > > >with no way to start a backup to server, and no selective restore.
> > > > >
> > > > >(We have backup to media, restore from media, but no selective
> > > > >restore from media. Also, restore from media replaces Journal!)
> > > > >
> > > > >>However, the ultimate problem is thinking of the problem as one of
> > > > >>backup. If you try to solve the wrong problem, often the result is
> > > > >>a
> > > > >>wasted effort.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>The Journal is single place where Sugar users save their documents.
> > > > >>This is done by the Sugar activities when they close. The majority
> > > > >>of XOs are still XO-1s with a 1GB store.
> > > > >This point in your argument is void, because XO-1 are 45% of the XO
> > > > >laptops manufactured so far. I have the numbers.
> > > > >
> > > > >Also, many XO-1 have been upgraded with an SD card.
> > > > >
> > > > >>If the available store is less than 50GB,
> > > > >No, that's 50 MB, not 50 GB. See _SPACE_TRESHOLD (sic) in
> > > > >sugar:src/jarabe/journal/journalactivity.py [3].
> > > > >
> > > > >3.
> > > [12]https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/src/jarabe/journal/
> journalactivity.py#L56
> > > > >
> > > > >>Sugar effectively shuts down.
> > > > >This point in your argument is void, because this has been fixed [4,
> > > > >5, 6], please upgrade to Sugar 0.108 which is in OLPC OS 13.2.7 [6].
> > > > >
> > > > >4. [13]http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9623
> > > > >5. [14]https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1720
> > > > >6. [15]http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/13.2.7#Fixes
> > > > >
> > > > >>This typically results in the deployment reflashing the XO erasing
> > > > >>all of the documents created by that user - a tragedy.
> > > > >It was a known bug, so that's a training issue. You previously
> > > > >proposed to train a teacher to use "rm -rf" to delete a known_hosts
> > > > >file instead of Manash coding up an "ssh-keygen -R" command. It is
> > > > >inconsistent to be able to do one and not the other.
> > > > >
> > > > >>What I am proposing is to use the school server as the primary
> > > > >>store
> > > > >>for the Journal with its effectively unlimited storage capacity.
> > > > >>The
> > > > >>ds_backup script needs to read the datastore uploading any new or
> > > > >>modified documents. The local datastore can then be viewed as a
> > > > >>cache for current working documents.
> > > > >I'm favour of this ideal in principle, but it remains a huge design
> > > > >and consensus challenge, not a coding challenge.
> > > > >
> > > > >However, with the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75 using IEEE 802.11g the
> > > > >local wireless network will collapse sooner due to this new load.
> > > > >
> > > > >>On the XO, the datastore is shown in the Journal. The 'keep' star
> > > > >There's no such thing. There's a favorite star [7]. It has a
> > > > >defined
> > > > >purpose. Are you proposing to destroy that purpose, or add another
> > > > >column to the journal? There's even less room now that the multiple
> > > > >selection checkbox was added.
> > > > >
> > > > >7. [16]https://help.sugarlabs.org/en/journal.html#journal-features
> > > > >
> > > > >>could be used to show whether there is a local copy of that
> > > > >>document
> > > > >>or not. If the document is not needed locally, the user can clear
> > > > >>the star. In this case, the backup script could delete the local
> > > > >>copy. If there is no local copy of the document, then the user
> > > > >>could
> > > > >>set the star. In this case the backup script could download the
> > > > >>document.
> > > > >My preference would be for the flag to be in the Journal detail
> > > > >view [8], where there is available display space.
> > > > >
> > > > >8. [17]https://help.sugarlabs.org/en/journal.html#
> journal-detail-view
> > > > >
> > > > >>This capability could be used to set a quota on the amount of space
> > > > >>used by the Journal. If the space is exceeded, the 'backup' script
> > > > >>could delete local copies of document by LRU until the quota is
> > > > >>met.
> > > > >>Similarly, there should be a quota on Sugar activities which could
> > > > >>also automatically be pruned back LRU. Managing the store
> > > > >>automatically is consistent with keeping the Sugar UI as simple as
> > > > >>possible.
> > > > >This should be built into Sugar rather than in the non-Sugar backup
> > > > >script. They should be maintained together.
> > > > >
> > > > >This would be a code change to git repository sugar-datastore and
> > > > >the
> > > > >Journal activity in repository sugar.
> > > > >
> > > > >>As always, there are complications. The original OLPC concept was
> > > > >>that there would be one XO per user. As a result the software was
> > > > >>designed for a single user identified by the XO serial number.
> > > > >The multiple user feature is supported by Fedora and Sugar, but we
> > > > >removed it for OLPC OS.
> > > > >
> > > > >>Today, many XO deployments provide enough XOs for a classroom.
> > > > >>During the day, different students use the XO as their class goes
> > > > >>to
> > > > >>the computer lab or as the computers are distributed from classroom
> > > > >>to classroom. However, all of the documents created are in a single
> > > > >>Journal with only the user's memory to indicate which document goes
> > > > >>with which user.
> > > > >OLPC did not design OLPC OS to be used in this scenario, so no
> > > > >surprise you've hit that. But it's not a Sugar problem. Don't
> > > > >conflate Sugar with OLPC OS.
> > > > >
> > > > >>The OLPC Ubuntu Sugar 14.04 Trusty LTS (to use its official name)
> > > > >>solves this problem at the laptop side by using standard gnu/linux
> > > > >>logins.
> > > > >The multiple user feature is supported by Ubuntu and Sugar, and I
> > > > >haven't removed it yet. I know how to; small configuration change
> > > > >to
> > > > >lightdm package.
> > > > >
> > > > >Don't forget SoaS. The Fedora 23 SoaS is easily installed to disk
> > > > >and
> > > > >has multiple user capability. The Fedora 24 SoaS is shaping up to
> > > > >be
> > > > >just as good or better, since it is based on Sugar 0.108.
> > > > >
> > > > >>Each user has her own username and password. The Sugar activities
> > > > >>have been moved to common space in the file system so only one copy
> > > > >>is needed to support multiple users. Users are not 'olpc' but
> > > > >>identified by their username. However, the datastore is part of
> > > > >>the
> > > > >>user space (one datastore per user).
> > > > >Yes. ODPU.
> > > > >
> > > > >>This is problematic since the backup script uploads to
> > > > >>/library/user/serial-number on the school server.
> > > > >No, you're wrong. In the Ubuntu scenario, the register_laptop
> > > > >function will invent a serial number because it won't find Open
> > > > >Firmware [1]. So it wouldn't be a problem. It doesn't sound like
> > > > >you've tested this.
> > > > >
> > > > >1.
> > > [18]https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/src/jarabe/desktop/
> schoolserver.py#L110
> > > > >
> > > > >>So, one strategy would be to upload to /library/user/username. This
> > > > >>requires that usernames be unique across all laptops using a given
> > > > >>schoolserver. This could be enforced at registration on the school
> > > > >>server.
> > > > >Starting to sound very complicated. Single-sign-on (SSO) across a
> > > > >school. These are truly amazing teachers with lots of free
> > > > >administration time.
> > > > >
> > > > >(There are deployments using Sugar with SSO already, but as it's
> > > > >outside the scope of Sugar we don't hear about them at Sugar Labs,
> > > > >and
> > > > >we don't provide the facility in OLPC OS, but that doesn't stop
> > > > >them.)
> > > > >
> > > > >>However, the Sugar releases for the XO
> > > > >We call that OLPC OS, which includes Sugar and Gnome desktops.
> > > > >
> > > > >>still maintains Sugar activities in /home/olpc/Activities. So, one
> > > > >>requirement is to restructure Sugar as was done for OLPC Ubuntu
> > > > >>Sugar 14.04 Trusty LTS.
> > > > >That would not block implementing a server datastore, since the
> > > > >implementation would not care what $HOME is set to.
> > > > >
> > > > >(And besides, it's already done for SoaS, so the Fedora activity
> > > > >packages can be used immediately.)
> > > > >
> > > > >>Another approach might be to create directories for each user of a
> > > > >>single XO (e.g. /library/user/serial-number/user1).
> > > > >That would require authentication service by the server datastore.
> > > > >
> > > > >>Another complication is that the Browse activity downloads files
> > > > >>from the school server to the Journal (e.g. pdfs, mp3). These
> > > > >>documents do not need to be saved to the users Journal backup on
> > > > >>the
> > > > >>school server since they can be restored from the school server
> > > > >>'library'. Also, such documents when downloaded should be stored in
> > > > >>a common space available to all users of that laptop. Fortunately,
> > > > >>the source of a document is provided in the metadata.
> > > > >What you describe here can also be solved by deduplication.
> > > > >
> > > > >The Journal Git backend proposed by Martin and Walter could help
> > > > >with
> > > > >deduplication of journal objects across multiple journals.
> > > > >
> > > > >[19]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2016#Sugar_Core
> > > > >
> > > > >>One approach would be to divide the datastore into two directories
> > > > >>on the laptop, one in common space and the other local to the user.
> > > > >>The Journal could show both sets of objects.
> > > > >Or the server datastore would recognise content hashes of server
> > > > >artefacts and know it need not send the content from the client to
> > > > >the
> > > > >server before LRU local deletion. It could hard link it.
> > > > >
> > > > >>Finally, each Journal object consists of a metadata file and an
> > > > >>optional document. The metadata files tend to clutter the Journal
> > > > >>display (mine has hundreds of Terminal activity and Log activity
> > > > >>entries). I would propose that the Journal show only objects which
> > > > >>have a document with a user-supplied name (a metadata flag). The
> > > > >>script should backup the metadata files for those objects without a
> > > > >>document to a 'log' on the school server for statistical analysis
> > > > >>but delete them from the local datastore. Journal objects saved
> > > > >>without a user-supplied name (but something like Write.activity)
> > > > >>should have their document deleted. As part of GSOC there is an
> > > > >>initiative to require users to supply a name for documents they
> > > > >>wish
> > > > >>to save - so this problem may not be part of the 'backup' scheme.
> > > > >>Whether a document is saved or deleted, the metadata can be saved
> > > > >>to
> > > > >>the log and displayed by the existing statistical tools.
> > > > >I'm against any classification of journal objects in this way. We
> > > > >cannot know how useful a Terminal and Log activity object is to the
> > > > >learner.
> > > > >
> > > > >However, I would like a way for expert users to terminate an
> > > > >activity
> > > > >without saving a journal object.
> > > > >
> > > > >>As an old crumudgeon, I still believe design precedes coding.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Reading the existing code is always a good idea:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Sugar
> > > > >>
> > > > >> *
> > > > >>/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jarabe/desktop/schoolserver.py
> > > > >>#registers server - notice transition from gconf to gsettings
> > > > >> * /usr/bin/ds_backup.sh #primarily decides if backup can be
> > > > >> run
> > > > >> #backup logic is
> > > > >> needed
> > > > >>because an rsync can use a lot of bandwidth in a local network
> > > > >> * /usr/bin/ds_backup.py #actually does the backup using
> > > > >> rsync
> > > > >>(note: -d option AFAIK deletes an object from the backup if it is
> > > > >>deleted in the source,
> > > > >> #this has the effect
> > > > >> of
> > > > >>limiting the size of the datastore to the available space on the XO
> > > > >>not on the school server).
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Server (xsce6)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> * /usr/libexec/idmgr #contains a number of utilities
> > > > >>used in registration
> > > > >> * /library/users #contains a directory per
> > > > >>serial-number of registered user
> > > > >> #use ls -a to see
> > > > >> files
> > > > >>created. The idmgr creates a public/private key pair which is used
> > > > >>by sftp to authenticate - avoiding password
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Note: if you look at the server code, you can see why registering
> > > > >>the laptop on each connection works (and can avoid any need for a
> > > > >>registration menu item).
> > > > >>
> > > > >>When you get to know your way around the existing process, I'll
> > > > >>send
> > > > >>you a copy of the ds_backup.py code I use to implement the item by
> > > > >>item backup.
> > > > >You should start using GitHub like the rest of us.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > > [20]Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > > [21]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Cameron
> > > [22]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > [23]Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > [24]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > [25]Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [26]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
> References:
>
> [1] mailto:server-devel at lists.laptop.org
> [2] https://github.com/ManashRaja/sugar/commit/3ad4d847d0f2373d5bfe9f6c8e201b358f3f68e0
> [3] mailto:me at jvonau.ca
> [4] mailto:mpdmanash at gmail.com
> [5] https://github.com/ManashRaja/sugar/commit/660985d2183416cd3ed758095e92adf82f87a10c
> [6] http://schoolserver:5000/
> [7] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_XS-server_registration
> [8] mailto:quozl at laptop.org
> [9] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2016-April/thread.html
> [10] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code#2016
> [11] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2016#Sugar_on_the_Ground
> [12] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/src/jarabe/journal/journalactivity.py#L56
> [13] http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9623
> [14] https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1720
> [15] http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/13.2.7#Fixes
> [16] https://help.sugarlabs.org/en/journal.html#journal-features
> [17] https://help.sugarlabs.org/en/journal.html#journal-detail-view
> [18] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/src/jarabe/desktop/schoolserver.py#L110
> [19] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2016#Sugar_Core
> [20] mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [21] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> [22] http://quozl.netrek.org/
> [23] mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [24] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> [25] mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [26] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list