[Sugar-devel] Election status?

[Dan Tenason]

walterbender back to the topic for one sec
23:58   I worry that once again the election process is stalled
23:58   can we appoint a SLOB member to work with the committee to make sure things move forward?
23:58   any volunteers?
23:58   CanoeBerry, ???
23:59 gonzalo walterbender, at least we should ask to the comite by email and openly in the mailimg list for the status
00:00   walterbender, some of the has been very vocal about the lack of a election
00:00   walterbender, some of them has been very vocal about the lack of a election
00:00 walterbender yes
00:00   so perhaps one of our more vocal members should take the lead on this...
00:00   why I recommend CanoeBerry
00:01 CanoeBerry i can talk to Caryl Bigenho and others, yes
00:01 gonzalo CanoeBerry, thanks
00:01 walterbender CanoeBerry, thanks. would be a big help
00:02   sent Caryl two different blog posts for her newsletter and hear nothing back :P
00:02 gonzalo CanoeBerry, you are a good candidate to move this forward, you have contact with the diverse olpc ecosystem
00:02 claudia_ agree
00:02 gonzalo walterbender, i sent her a article too
00:04   by the way, the newsletter was a good idea, i think
00:05 walterbender well, we have a plan :)
00:05   moving on...
The meeting log seems to support the speculation that the election process has stalled.

Two and a half months passed without movement.  When appointed the task, Mr. Holt gave a response the he would talk to ' Caryl Bigenho and others.' Since then, two more weeks have passed without  public signs of progress from either Ms. Bigenhho or Mr. Holt.

Dan

>Thursday, September 24, 2015 6:00 AM -04:00 from Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>:
>
>On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Dan Tenason < dan.tenason at mail.ru > wrote:
>> Is anything happening on the election front?
>>
>> The last public comment was the first week of July. It seemed there was much
>> stuff to do. So much stuff that the earliest possible date to hold an
>> election would be in November, 4 month later. Here we are 2.5 months later
>> and not a single public indicator of progress.
>
>The last public discussion was at the September SLOB meeting
>( http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2015-09-14 ).
>
>>
>> A cynical person might think that there is the same amount of substance
>> behind the oversight board as there is behind the statement that three
>> million students use Sugar activities daily.
>
>A person who attended the meeting or read the minutes rather than make
>groundless speculations might think that the oversight board is
>concerned that the election committee is failing to meet its deadlines
>and consequently appointed a liaison to expedite the process. A person
>who attended the meeting or read the minutes would also note that
>progress in being made on the new website and feedback has been
>requested.
>
>regards.
>
>-walter
>
>>
>> --
>> Dan Tenason
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>  Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Walter Bender
>Sugar Labs
>http://www.sugarlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20150930/abf8b058/attachment-0001.html>