[Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

[Thomas Gilliard]

On 9/9/2015 10:05 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>
>> On September 8, 2015 at 6:55 PM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> So to briefly restate.
>>>>
>>>> Problem: Sugar does not start on F23.
>>>>
>>>> Diagnosis: the shared library libsugarext.so.0 cannot be loaded,
>>>> because of a missing symbol, yet the symbol can be found with
>>>> strings(1).
>>>>
>>>> Workaround #1: use F22 packages.
>>>>
>>>> Workaround #2: use Martin's packages which were a rebuild of
>>>> sugar-toolkit-gtk3 with .spec file change
>>>>
>>>>          %undefine _hardened_build
>>>
>>> Yes, and both workarounds have in common that sugar-toolkit-gtk3 is
>>> built
>>> without _hardened_build (by default on fc22 and explicitly on my
>>> modified
>>> fc23 package).
>> So this work around is now in updates-testing. It works for me with
>> basic testing, I've checked that the vast majority of Activities at
>> least run. We should have the update pulled into the next test
>> compose.
> Confirmed for F23, boot TC4 with systemd.unit=runlevel3.target, login as
> liveuser, "sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update
> sugar-toolkit-gtk3",
> "sudo systemctl isolate runlevel5.target" results in Sugar loading.
>
> However booting Fedora-Live-SoaS-x86_64-rawhide-20150909.iso[1] that has
> the updated rpm[2] results in a gray background after the intro screens.
> Not sure if that is sugar or rawhide related, I'll try rawhide again in a
> week or so.
>
> Jerry
>
> 1. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11015589
> 2.
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5589/11015589/mock_output.log
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Confirmed with f23 SoaS live x86_64 [1]
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Beta_TC4/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-SoaS-x86_64-23_Beta-TC4.iso
  (in f23 virtual machine manager)

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240147#c13

Thanks
Tom Gilliard
satellit