[Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user
Jerry Vonau
me at jvonau.ca
Sat Sep 5 01:22:57 EDT 2015
> On September 4, 2015 at 6:12 PM Jerry Vonau <me at jvonau.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > On September 4, 2015 at 12:37 PM Martin Abente
> > <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello Peter,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 4 Sep 2015 00:22, "Martin Abente" <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:43 PM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>
> > > > wrote:
<snip>
> > > >> Is the package present?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No, is not present. Also, that does not explain why the same 106
> > > packages work perfectly fine on fc23 when are built for fc22, while
> > > they
> > > fail when built for fc23.
> > > >
> > > > As you mentioned in a previous reply, the only difference in build
> > > > time
> > > I also noticed, looking at the logs, is
> > > the -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld' flag. which is
> > > passed to
> > > all gir-* (gobject introspection) calls.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, it's a well advertised feature of F-23, but we're not the first
> > > distro to enable it and unless there's dodgy stuff going on in sugar
> > > it
> > > should cause no issues.
> > >
> >
>
> Added both bugs listed in bugzilla as blockers for Bug 1199775 -
> (harden-failure)
>
> > I rebuilt [1] the sugar-toolkit-gtk3 106 packages for fc23, adding
> > "%undefine
> > _hardened_build" [2,3] to the .spec file, and now Sugar works fine on
> > fc23.
> >
>
> Comparing build.logs on F23 with/without hardened_build these stick out
> vs
> F22:
> -DGLIB_MIN_REQUIRED_VERSION=GLIB_VERSION_2_42
> -DGLIB_MAX_ALLOWED_VERSION=GLIB_VERSION_2_44
>
> Think those flags get pulled into the buildroot via gtk3-devel[1] with
> the
> change introduced in July[2] , glib2 with F22 having 2.44 and F23 having
> 2.45
>
That was not fruitful, just had to check for my own curiosity.
> > I could not figure out why having _hardened_build enable breaks sugar,
> > but
> > it looks like disabling could be an option for now.
>
> I have a theory that hardened_build enforces those flags while 2.45 is
> installed in the buildroot but doesn't fail the building.
Nope, makes no difference with hardened_build in effect. The debugging link
[3] as hardened_build is enforcing -fPIE, so debugging is at 3b for who
ever take the next steps.
Jerry
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list