[Sugar-devel] [Spam] Re: Add more components to bugs.sl.org

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Tony,
The activities already have different components.
We are talking about the internals of Sugar.

If one specific activity do not have a component can be added, always that
there are a developer maintaining
the activity. In the case of TuxMath we don't have a developer.

Gonzalo

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net>
wrote:

> I think it would be desirable to have a separation of trac tickets for
> each Sugar Activity. They are not a part of Sugar (except perhaps the
> Journal Activity). Combining
> all of the tracs in one makes it hard to find tracs that pertain to a
> specific version of a specific Sugar Activity (e.g. tux-math).
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 10/13/2015 03:43 PM, James Cameron wrote:
>
>> Taking a position I do not hold: the only reason I can think of is so
>> that the git repository name relates to the component as a one to one.
>>
>> I don't think that is necessary, but that's what the original poster
>> was asking.
>>
>> My other suggestions are unchanged.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 07:18:03AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>>
>>> In the past, we had a component for every sugar module (sugar-artwork,
>>> sugar,
>>> sugar-toolkit, sugar-datastore).
>>> A few years ago, as maintainership was common, all that components were
>>> unified
>>> in the 'sugar' component.
>>> What is the reason to separate them now?
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:37 PM, James Cameron <[1]quozl at laptop.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>      Yes, the Components and Versions lists in trac are out of date.
>>>
>>>      No, we can't expect or ask for users to choose between artwork,
>>>      toolkit, and jarabe.  Users will get this wrong.  I'm fine with just
>>>      Sugar.
>>>
>>>      Other suggestions:
>>>
>>>      1.  remove the 0.102.0 Milestone,
>>>
>>>      2.  add Versions for 0.100, 0.102, 0.104, 0.106,
>>>
>>>      3.  remove Versions before 0.98,
>>>
>>>      4.  make sure every activity in the Ubuntu or Fedora builds is
>>> listed
>>>      in the Component list.
>>>          --
>>>      James Cameron
>>>      [2]http://quozl.linux.org.au/
>>>      _______________________________________________
>>>      Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>      [3]Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>      [4]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gonzalo Odiard
>>>
>>> References:
>>>
>>> [1] mailto:quozl at laptop.org
>>> [2] http://quozl.linux.org.au/
>>> [3] mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> [4] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>



-- 
Gonzalo Odiard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20151013/71de82d8/attachment.html>