[Sugar-devel] Add more components to bugs.sl.org

[James Cameron]

Taking a position I do not hold: the only reason I can think of is so
that the git repository name relates to the component as a one to one.

I don't think that is necessary, but that's what the original poster
was asking.

My other suggestions are unchanged.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 07:18:03AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> In the past, we had a component for every sugar module (sugar-artwork, sugar,
> sugar-toolkit, sugar-datastore).
> A few years ago, as maintainership was common, all that components were unified
> in the 'sugar' component.
> What is the reason to separate them now?
> 
> Gonzalo 
> 
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:37 PM, James Cameron <[1]quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
> 
>     Yes, the Components and Versions lists in trac are out of date.
> 
>     No, we can't expect or ask for users to choose between artwork,
>     toolkit, and jarabe.  Users will get this wrong.  I'm fine with just
>     Sugar.
> 
>     Other suggestions:
> 
>     1.  remove the 0.102.0 Milestone,
> 
>     2.  add Versions for 0.100, 0.102, 0.104, 0.106,
> 
>     3.  remove Versions before 0.98,
> 
>     4.  make sure every activity in the Ubuntu or Fedora builds is listed
>     in the Component list.
>    
>     --
>     James Cameron
>     [2]http://quozl.linux.org.au/
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sugar-devel mailing list
>     [3]Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>     [4]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> 
> --
> Gonzalo Odiard
> 
> References:
> 
> [1] mailto:quozl at laptop.org
> [2] http://quozl.linux.org.au/
> [3] mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [4] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/