[Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 79, Issue 61
Walter Bender
walter.bender at gmail.com
Tue May 26 09:42:55 EDT 2015
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Sebastian Silva <sebastian at fuentelibre.org>
wrote:
> On 26/05/15 08:13, Walter Bender wrote:
> > The idea from Day One was that the Sugar environment would be for
> > exploration and the GNOME desktop would be used for production.
> I never read this and I completely disagree. IMHO one should be able to
> do the same things on either desktop. Of course, this is not to say one
> should deploy production apps on any desktop.
>
Maybe we can agree to disagree on this issue. While it would be lovely to
have the resources to make every GNOME tool run flawlessly in Sugar, I
don't see that happening. (Nor do I see the point, but I am happy to hear
arguments as to why this would be important.) To me, Sugar has always had
different goals than GNOME, hence the need to build a separate desktop. But
never was one of the goals to replace GNOME.
regards.
-walter
>
> --
> I+D SomosAzucar.Org
> "icarito" #somosazucar en Freenode IRC
> "Nadie libera a nadie, nadie se libera solo. Los seres humanos se liberan
> en comunión" - P. Freire
>
>
--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20150526/c1ad970d/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list