[Sugar-devel] Feature discussion can also be found on GitHub

[James Cameron]

Would it be bidirectional?

(That is, would a reply by mail cause a change in GitHub?)

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:46:41AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> We can make send a email to the mailing list for every event in GitHub.
> I would like that, and sugar-devel is low traffic now.
> Remember, previously we did all the review process in the mailing list
> and that was not a problem.
> Anybody think that would be a bad idea?
> We can try and if is too much, we can disable it too.
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 7:09 PM, James Cameron <[1]quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
> 
>     Sugar source code development is hosted on GitHub, which provides
>     discussion threads on each proposal.
> 
>     Non-developers: some features and changes will be in our next version
>     without any discussion on sugar-devel@
> 
>     To keep track of these off-list discussions, watch the sugarlabs
>     repositories, in particular the pull requests for repositories such as
>     sugar: [2]https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pulls
> 
>     Or the other components and activities you are interested in:
>     [3]https://github.com/sugarlabs
> 
>     To join a discussion, sign up for a GitHub account.
> 
>     There seems to be no way to extend these discussions into sugar-devel@
>     in a bidirectional manner.
>    
>     --
>     James Cameron
>     [4]http://quozl.linux.org.au/
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sugar-devel mailing list
>     [5]Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>     [6]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> 
> --
> Gonzalo Odiard
> 
> SugarLabs - Software for children learning 
> 
> References:
> 
> [1] mailto:quozl at laptop.org
> [2] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pulls
> [3] https://github.com/sugarlabs
> [4] http://quozl.linux.org.au/
> [5] mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [6] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/