[Sugar-devel] Subject: Activities maintainership
tony_anderson at usa.net
Mon May 11 03:20:27 EDT 2015
I was thinking more about which activities have Pootle support (included
the po file, used __gettext__ and so on).
On 05/08/2015 01:53 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> Re which actives are in pootle, it is by request through trac. Nothing
> to do with which group it is included in.
> On May 8, 2015 2:15 AM, "Tony Anderson" <tony_anderson at usa.net
> <mailto:tony_anderson at usa.net>> wrote:
> I doubt anyone has the time to go through ASLO and determine which
> activity repositories are still hosted at Sugarlabs or which
> activities do not support Pootle. It would be nice to have these
> added to the list.
> I assume that the division of activities into Sucrose, etc. has
> some official meaning. I had thought those were associated with
> Activity Central. Is there some process for deciding which
> category to place an activity, e.g. ones included in a signed release?
> Some of the documentation also needs updating. For example, the
> Browse activity web page is given in ASLO as
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Browse. This page directs you to
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4024 as the home
> page. This page describes 129.1 (an Xulrunner version). The
> 'source code' link takes you to
> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse. The pootle page links
> 'Web' (not Browse) to
> http://translate.sugarlabs.org/projects/Web/. This pages shows the
> translation status of the Browse activity. The wiki does not link
> to the github repository which is
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/browse-activity. A Google search for
> a github project 'Web' returns
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web; however a search for
> github browse activity returns the correct link.
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> <mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sugar-devel