[Sugar-devel] subject changed from upper case

[Martin Abente]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>
wrote:

> In 3 hours. Might work for me for the first hour any way. I'll try to be
> there.
>

Works for me, will be there.

>
> -walter
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Ifeanyi Peter <ifeanyipeter42 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Thank you very much for your last timely mail.
> >
> > I think by 2:00PM GMT will be very nice
> >
> > kind regards
> > Ifeanyi
> >
> >
> > On Monday, January 12, 2015 12:04 PM, Walter Bender
> > <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Short notice... that is today. But maybe we can get enough people to
> > show up. What time?
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Ifeanyi Peter <ifeanyipeter42 at yahoo.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Dear Sir,
> >>
> >> I will like to propose Mondey 12th January, 2015 for the triage metting
> >>
> >> Thank you
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sunday, January 11, 2015 9:13 PM, Walter Bender
> >> <walter.bender at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Back to the topic of the email, would Friday work for a triage
> >> meeting? Maybe late morning on the US East Coast so not to be too late
> >> in Europe/Africa?
> >>
> >> -walter
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> I am sorry for trying to threaten a user who, as it turns out, sent a
> >>> message that was not of an unsolicited nature.
> >>>
> >>> Such threat will now be reversed.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for the patience to tell me about this issue.
> >>>
> >>>> On Jan 11, 2015, at 11:51 AM, Jerry Vonau <me at jvonau.ca> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Let's analyze why this email was flagged as spam with an eye to
> helping
> >>>> instead of a blanket "I'll report you".
> >>>>
> >>>>> On January 11, 2015 at 11:39 AM Ryan Cunningham <
> rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The message you have sent appears to be spam:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> >>>>>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.9 required=3.5 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING,
> >>>>
> >>>> So the total is above the threshold, which is made up of:
> >>>>
> >>>>        *  1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
> >>>>
> >>>> Using ALL CAPS in the subject line, 1.6
> >>>> Please use proper case here, the use of ALL CAPS is considered to be
> >>>> shouting also.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>      * 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username
> ends
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>>      digit *      (ifeanyi peter <ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com> )
> >>>>>>      * 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail
> username
> >>>>>> ends
> >>>>>>      in *      digit (ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com)
> >>>>
> >>>> 0.4 for having digits in the email addresses.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>      *  1.7 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not sure if I agree with such a high rating for being polite with
> >>>> the
> >>>> use of "Dear..." but together with the above ratings puts this email
> >>>> over
> >>>> the required=3.5 threshold.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>      *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
> >>>>>>      *  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not
> >>>>>> valid
> >>>>>> X-Spam-Level: ***
> >>>>>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
> >>>>>>      sunjammer.sugarlabs.org <http://sunjammer.sugarlabs.org/>
> >>>>> I’m sorry to tell you this, but junk mail messages are not accepted
> on
> >>>>> the Sugar Labs development mailing list.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Think the subject line is what put this email over the spam limit.
> That
> >>>> is
> >>>> easy to fix by the sender.
> >>>> Nothing below I would consider as spam, no html, url links, ads, just
> a
> >>>> request for a meeting.
> >>>>
> >>>>> If you continue posting to this mailing list, you may be reported to
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) of the U.S. Department of
> >>>>> Justice’s
> >>>>> Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National White Collar Crime
> >>>>> Center.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Some of the new developers may not have much experience with what
> >>>> amounts
> >>>> to business correspondence and may need a bit of guidance in the best
> >>>> practices. What a great way to scare off eager new developers, threats
> >>>> of
> >>>> the FBI being involved.
> >>>>
> >>>>>> On Jan 9, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Ifeanyi Peter <ifeanyipeter42 at yahoo.com
> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Dear Sir,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A proposal to do a triage meeting with suggestions below:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1) Wrapping up loose ends before the sugar 104 release  and the end
> of
> >>>>>> GCI
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2) To block off a 3-hour window
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you as my proposal is considerable granted timely.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> kind regards,
> >>>>>> Ifeanyi Matthew
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Just my 2 cents,
> >>>>
> >>>> Jerry
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Sugar-devel mailing list
> >>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Walter Bender
> >>
> >> Sugar Labs
> >>
> >> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Walter Bender
> > Sugar Labs
> > http://www.sugarlabs.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20150112/74b00c0a/attachment.html>