[Sugar-devel] subject changed from upper case

[Walter Bender]

In 3 hours. Might work for me for the first hour any way. I'll try to be there.

-walter

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Ifeanyi Peter <ifeanyipeter42 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thank you very much for your last timely mail.
>
> I think by 2:00PM GMT will be very nice
>
> kind regards
> Ifeanyi
>
>
> On Monday, January 12, 2015 12:04 PM, Walter Bender
> <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Short notice... that is today. But maybe we can get enough people to
> show up. What time?
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Ifeanyi Peter <ifeanyipeter42 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>> Dear Sir,
>>
>> I will like to propose Mondey 12th January, 2015 for the triage metting
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, January 11, 2015 9:13 PM, Walter Bender
>> <walter.bender at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Back to the topic of the email, would Friday work for a triage
>> meeting? Maybe late morning on the US East Coast so not to be too late
>> in Europe/Africa?
>>
>> -walter
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> I am sorry for trying to threaten a user who, as it turns out, sent a
>>> message that was not of an unsolicited nature.
>>>
>>> Such threat will now be reversed.
>>>
>>> Thank you for the patience to tell me about this issue.
>>>
>>>> On Jan 11, 2015, at 11:51 AM, Jerry Vonau <me at jvonau.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Let's analyze why this email was flagged as spam with an eye to helping
>>>> instead of a blanket "I'll report you".
>>>>
>>>>> On January 11, 2015 at 11:39 AM Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The message you have sent appears to be spam:
>>>>>
>>>>>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>>>>>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.9 required=3.5 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING,
>>>>
>>>> So the total is above the threshold, which is made up of:
>>>>
>>>>        *  1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
>>>>
>>>> Using ALL CAPS in the subject line, 1.6
>>>> Please use proper case here, the use of ALL CAPS is considered to be
>>>> shouting also.
>>>>
>>>>>>      * 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>      digit *      (ifeanyi peter <ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com> )
>>>>>>      * 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username
>>>>>> ends
>>>>>>      in *      digit (ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com)
>>>>
>>>> 0.4 for having digits in the email addresses.
>>>>
>>>>>>      *  1.7 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure if I agree with such a high rating for being polite with
>>>> the
>>>> use of "Dear..." but together with the above ratings puts this email
>>>> over
>>>> the required=3.5 threshold.
>>>>
>>>>>>      *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
>>>>>>      *  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not
>>>>>> valid
>>>>>> X-Spam-Level: ***
>>>>>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
>>>>>>      sunjammer.sugarlabs.org <http://sunjammer.sugarlabs.org/>
>>>>> I’m sorry to tell you this, but junk mail messages are not accepted on
>>>>> the Sugar Labs development mailing list.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Think the subject line is what put this email over the spam limit. That
>>>> is
>>>> easy to fix by the sender.
>>>> Nothing below I would consider as spam, no html, url links, ads, just a
>>>> request for a meeting.
>>>>
>>>>> If you continue posting to this mailing list, you may be reported to
>>>>> the
>>>>> Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) of the U.S. Department of
>>>>> Justice’s
>>>>> Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National White Collar Crime
>>>>> Center.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Some of the new developers may not have much experience with what
>>>> amounts
>>>> to business correspondence and may need a bit of guidance in the best
>>>> practices. What a great way to scare off eager new developers, threats
>>>> of
>>>> the FBI being involved.
>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 9, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Ifeanyi Peter <ifeanyipeter42 at yahoo.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A proposal to do a triage meeting with suggestions below:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Wrapping up loose ends before the sugar 104 release  and the end of
>>>>>> GCI
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) To block off a 3-hour window
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you as my proposal is considerable granted timely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>>> Ifeanyi Matthew
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just my 2 cents,
>>>>
>>>> Jerry
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>>
>> Sugar Labs
>>
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>
>



-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org