[Sugar-devel] subject changed from upper case

[Walter Bender]

Short notice... that is today. But maybe we can get enough people to
show up. What time?

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Ifeanyi Peter <ifeanyipeter42 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> I will like to propose Mondey 12th January, 2015 for the triage metting
>
> Thank you
>
>
> On Sunday, January 11, 2015 9:13 PM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Back to the topic of the email, would Friday work for a triage
> meeting? Maybe late morning on the US East Coast so not to be too late
> in Europe/Africa?
>
> -walter
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I am sorry for trying to threaten a user who, as it turns out, sent a
>> message that was not of an unsolicited nature.
>>
>> Such threat will now be reversed.
>>
>> Thank you for the patience to tell me about this issue.
>>
>>> On Jan 11, 2015, at 11:51 AM, Jerry Vonau <me at jvonau.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>> Let's analyze why this email was flagged as spam with an eye to helping
>>> instead of a blanket "I'll report you".
>>>
>>>> On January 11, 2015 at 11:39 AM Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The message you have sent appears to be spam:
>>>>
>>>>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>>>>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.9 required=3.5 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING,
>>>
>>> So the total is above the threshold, which is made up of:
>>>
>>>        *  1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
>>>
>>> Using ALL CAPS in the subject line, 1.6
>>> Please use proper case here, the use of ALL CAPS is considered to be
>>> shouting also.
>>>
>>>>>      * 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends
>>>>> in
>>>>>      digit *      (ifeanyi peter <ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com> )
>>>>>      * 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username
>>>>> ends
>>>>>      in *      digit (ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com)
>>>
>>> 0.4 for having digits in the email addresses.
>>>
>>>>>      *  1.7 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if I agree with such a high rating for being polite with the
>>> use of "Dear..." but together with the above ratings puts this email over
>>> the required=3.5 threshold.
>>>
>>>>>      *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
>>>>>      *  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not
>>>>> valid
>>>>> X-Spam-Level: ***
>>>>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
>>>>>      sunjammer.sugarlabs.org <http://sunjammer.sugarlabs.org/>
>>>> I’m sorry to tell you this, but junk mail messages are not accepted on
>>>> the Sugar Labs development mailing list.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Think the subject line is what put this email over the spam limit. That
>>> is
>>> easy to fix by the sender.
>>> Nothing below I would consider as spam, no html, url links, ads, just a
>>> request for a meeting.
>>>
>>>> If you continue posting to this mailing list, you may be reported to the
>>>> Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) of the U.S. Department of
>>>> Justice’s
>>>> Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National White Collar Crime
>>>> Center.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Some of the new developers may not have much experience with what amounts
>>> to business correspondence and may need a bit of guidance in the best
>>> practices. What a great way to scare off eager new developers, threats of
>>> the FBI being involved.
>>>
>>>>> On Jan 9, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Ifeanyi Peter <ifeanyipeter42 at yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>>
>>>>> A proposal to do a triage meeting with suggestions below:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Wrapping up loose ends before the sugar 104 release  and the end of
>>>>> GCI
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) To block off a 3-hour window
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you as my proposal is considerable granted timely.
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>> Ifeanyi Matthew
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Just my 2 cents,
>>>
>>> Jerry
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
>
> Sugar Labs
>
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>



-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org