[Sugar-devel] [Systems] New ASLO Bundles on the Mirror
James Cameron
quozl at laptop.org
Tue Jan 6 19:44:18 EST 2015
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:24:47AM +0000, Sam P. wrote:
> On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 8:54:19 am James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:39:06PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > +sugar-devel
> >
> > On 01/06/2015 04:52 AM, Sam P. wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I was wondering about the possibility of putting the new
> > > ASLO bundles on the download.sl.o mirror. I was going to
> > > put them into a separate folder (named "activities2"), so
> > > there may be duplication from the old ASLO bundles,
> > > resulting in more space usage. This will hopefully be short
> > > term :)
> >
> > Go ahead, all our mirrors should be fine carrying a few
> > hundred MBs of data. However, I don't believe you for a moment
> > when you say it's going to be short term ;-)
>
> Activity bundles? One could also run hardlink(1) on the two
> trees, which would eliminate the duplication.
>
> I use a different file system structure to the old ASLO. It is very
> different, because the old ASLO uses it's own IDs whereas I use
> bundle IDs.
Is it so different that the bundle .xo file content is different?
Why? That would mean an .xo downloaded from old ASLO would be
different to .xo downloaded for new ASLO, right?
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list