[Sugar-devel] Building a customized image of Sugar .100

Jerry Vonau me at jvonau.ca
Wed Sep 3 22:37:23 EDT 2014



> On September 3, 2014 at 6:17 PM James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
>
>
> +CC devel@
> http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10918
>
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:04:21AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > Hi James,
> > On September 2, 2014 at 10:25 PM James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 06:17:48PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > > What is really handy to have for debugging is a copy of the
> > > > master kickstart file used at image creation time. This file has
> > > > the order of the scriptlets that are used in os-builder, and
> > > > presents a nice play by play of the whole build process. There
> > > > is a patch to keep it around for inspection[1]
> > >
> > > Agreed, very useful.  It exposes private repositories though, so
> > > I'm none to keen on having the output go to the same directory
> > > used for publishing the build files.  What do you think?
> >
> > Don't think that it really matters if one has made the ini file for
> > OOB public, the same information is available there. I think this
> > file should be made public in the same way as packages.txt and
> > friends are handled now.  One could always later delete or not
> > upload the build.ks file should one want to. Not making all the OOB
> > output files public is something less than full disclosure IMHO and
> > should be avoided.
>
> I agree, it should be made public, but it can't.  So we only commit
> the .ini file changes that don't list the hidden repositories.  Full
> disclosure is incompatible with licensing agreements.  While it would
> be nice to be free of them, that's not achievable; a nirvana fallacy.
>
> It's one all.  I'd like to hear what others think.

I have to ask "what licensing agreements"? Are we talking Vmeta[1] support
now?
Are you implying there are two levels of hardware support for some XO
variants?
One level that is available with the standard released build, and a second
level
only available via custom builds or later installation? 

Think I might know the answers but I would like to read the reply,

Jerry

1. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Vmeta


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list