[Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

[Gonzalo Odiard]

I think the spec was fixed by peter in sugar-speak 48-2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167791

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Iain Brown Douglas <
iain at browndouglas.plus.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:56 +0000, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva
> > > <sebastian at somosazucar.org> wrote:
> > > > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?
> > >
> > > No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it breaks in
> > > certain situations, isn't re-distributable, causes problems the
> > > upstream maintainer won't fix or any number of other reasons. What
> > > ever the reason is it's historical and not documented, I wouldn't
> > > assume malice. It's likely because translations or similar were broken
> > > at the time. I mean we are talking the heady days of Fedora 14 when it
> > > was removed!
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva <sebastian at somosazucar.org
> >:
> > > >> I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was
> removed.
> > > >> It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru.
> > > >> I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor
> was I
> > > >> aware of any bugs related to it or performance.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please add it back
> > > >> Sebastian Silva
> > > >> http://somosazucar.org/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>:
> > > >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard <
> godiard at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson <
> pbrobinson at gmail.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard <
> godiard at sugarlabs.org>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be
> deleted.
> > > >>>>> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> It goes back long before I was  the maintainer and was previously
> > > >>>>> working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has
> been
> > > >>>>> working for years does it suddenly break.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198
> > > >>>>
> > Just an observation, mainly from what I learned the past few days,
> > rather than memory.
> >
> > Alice's brain in Speak has mysteriously appeared and disappeared for me
> > in SoaS.
> >
> > I just ran a SoaS Coconut CD, with Speak-29 on it. No functioning brain.
> > However I am guessing at the time I used it last, Speak would have been
> > updated from ASLO, and as a "Stick", the brain would have been
> > functioning.
> >
> > Iain
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like was done to
> make the
> > > >>>> activity
> > > >>>> work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably)
> > > >>>> cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this is still
> needed.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 removes the bots
> directory,
> > > >>>> _and_ apply the patch  sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to remove the
> need of the
> > > >>>> bots data,
> > > >>>> but right now, we are not applying that patch, then would be
> better add the
> > > >>>> bot directory again.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't remember the
> reason.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here.
> > > >>>
>
> Assertion, limited testing, please contradict:
> Speak, "Ask robot a question" is broken in SoaS 1.00 >
>
> It has been broken for several years, but is not seen because a Software
> update has been available which provides bot/ and functionality of "Ask
> robot a question".
>
> Please can we release Speak-49 to restore "Ask robot a question"
> functionality in SoaS 1.00 >
>
> Please can we hold back Speak-49 from the closing SoaS deadline. This
> way a Speak-49 Software update will be available to fix SoaS pro temps.
>
> I have no way of knowing how sugar-speak.spec file affects XOs, so I
> cannot propose to alter sugar-speak.spec myself.
>
> Iain
> > > >>> Peter
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>



-- 
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Software for children learning
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20141127/cde31ce0/attachment.html>