[Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

[Gonzalo Odiard]

xo-1.5 image do not boot, and show a strange gey patterns in the screen.

Gonzalo


On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:

> The xo1 image boots into sugar (latest from git) and wifi works. I'm now
> building xo4 images
>
>
> On 12 May 2014 02:12, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A couple more images, for xo1 and xo1.5. They have sugar packages built
>> from latest sugar git. I have not tested them yet so they might not even
>> boot, but if someone gives them a try please let me know how they works.
>>
>> http://146.185.144.82:3000/images/xo1/1/
>> http://146.185.144.82:3000/images/xo1.5/1/
>>
>> The xo1.5 one also *attempts* to fix the issue reported by Martin. The
>> problem is that I'm running the x86 build slave inside docker.io, which
>> doesn't like xpart. So I patched olpc-os-builder to manually losetup the
>> partitions, but it's sort of tricky to get right. It will work eventually :)
>>
>> I have arm packages for latest git almost built, so tomorrow I should be
>> able to build xo1.75 and xo4 images too. The oob configurations and some
>> initial bits of automated builds infra are now here
>>
>> https://github.com/dnarvaez/xugar
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 May 2014 20:49, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This could be a change I made. I will investigate and let you know.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 May 2014 20:31, Martin Abente <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> Could you check if this is correct?
>>>>
>>>> $md5sum 10001xx1.zd
>>>> $0cc8f3f71d636c8dc4464ffb8bf1847b  10001xx1.zd
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tested with 2 different XOs 1.5 and I am getting kernel panic errors
>>>> very early on the boot sequence, with message:
>>>>
>>>> tmpfs: No value for mount option 'strictatime'
>>>> mount: mounting on /newrun failed: invalid argument
>>>> mount used greatest stack depth 6752 bytes left.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Gonzalo Odiard <godiard at sugarlabs.org
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Downloading...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Martin Abente <
>>>>> martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Downloading 10001xx1.zd , will let you know how it goes soon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I made builds for xo1 and xo1.5 with the firmware change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The xo1 boots into sugar but there are no activities installed (I
>>>>>>> probably got something wrong in the ini). Testing on the xo1.5 one would be
>>>>>>> welcome, I'm curious if firmware solves the startup freeze.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11 May 2014 00:24, Martin Abente <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> great!! Let me know when you have an image with this!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez <
>>>>>>>> dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Firmware loading works with the rebuilt systemd! I have not tested
>>>>>>>>> much but wifi works now. Next step, build images with latest sugar...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10 May 2014 01:22, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I built a xo4 image, which like 1.75 boots fine into sugar
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/xo4/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The main problem, as discussed, is that firmwares are not loaded.
>>>>>>>>>> I'm building a systemd rpm with firmware loading enabled. If we can get
>>>>>>>>>> wifi working then it should be easier to play with stuff, building in the
>>>>>>>>>> virtual machine takes really too long.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9 May 2014 14:13, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I built an image for 1.75
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've not been able to test yet. I don't have my usual usb stick
>>>>>>>>>>> with me and having troubles finding something the XO likes.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8 May 2014 02:04, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> As an update, I have patched xorg-x11-drv-dove and built rpms
>>>>>>>>>>>> for it
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/f20-xo1.75/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now building an image with those.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2014 15:18, Martin Abente <
>>>>>>>>>>>> martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try your oob branch for 1.5, I do have XOs 1.5 for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > enough introspection to make the port compatible with it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more recent, feel free.  It isn't something OLPC is looking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at right
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now, but it would be helpful to the users.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not the die hard 0.98 users, of course.  ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm giving that a try. I was able to build a Fedora 20 image
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for XO 1.5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/dnarvaez/olpc-os-builder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have hardware to test that though... I'm now trying
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to build for 1.75 which is harder but I can actually test. I need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebuild the X driver but I think that will require some patching, let's see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if I can get it to work...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Devel at lists.laptop.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Gonzalo Odiard
>>>>>
>>>>> SugarLabs - Software for children learning
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Narvaez
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>


-- 
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Software for children learning
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20140512/3cd2bd4c/attachment-0001.html>