[Sugar-devel] shipped languages/locales

[Jerry Vonau]

The hint was given in the initial email, alter ALL_LINGUAS= in
/configure.ac

Jerry

> On March 26, 2014 at 1:27 PM Gonzalo Odiard <godiard at sugarlabs.org>
> wrote:
>
>
> Maybe the reason is we don't have en_GB in the variable ALL_LINGUAS in
> the
>  Makefile.in
> in sugar/po directory.
>
> In my system:
> * we have a file en_GB.po sugar-build/sugar/po/
> * the file is not copied
> in sugar-build/build/out/install/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES
>
> not sure how Makefile.in is created, here Makefile.in.in
> is a link to /usr/share/intltool/Makefile.in.in
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Jerry Vonau <me at jvonau.ca> wrote:
>
> > I know there is no translations for en_AU in Pootle therefore not in
> > sugar,
> > but en_GB was used in the past as a substitute for this shortcoming.
> > There
> > are languages in Pootle that form the source tar file that becomes part
> > of
> > the source rpm, however the resulting installable rpm doesn't ship all
> > the
> > languages available from the source rpm. This thread started with the
> > question should all the available translations from Pootle be shipped
> > in
> > the rpm, and that question still stands.
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > > On March 26, 2014 at 11:53 AM Chris Leonard
> > > <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > We do not have an en_AU language project in Pootle, so that does not
> > > surprise me.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Jerry Vonau <me at jvonau.ca> wrote:
> > > > That is strange, I don't see en_AU's translation file when
> > > > extracting
> > > > the
> > > > files from the released rpm[1]. The src[2] rpm's tar file only
> > > > lists
> > > > en_GB
> > > > and en_USA, but those are not in the released rpm and not en_AU at
> > > > all.
> > > >
> > > > Jerry
> > > >
> > > > 1.
> > > >
> > http://harvest.one-education.org/public/au1b-updates/RPMS/sugar-0.100.1-10.olpcau.noarch.rpm
> > > > 2.
> > > >
> > http://harvest.one-education.org/public/au1b-updates/SRPMS/sugar-0.100.1-10.olpcau.src.rpm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On March 26, 2014 at 9:07 AM Gonzalo Odiard
> > > >> <godiard at sugarlabs.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> We included en_AU, but not en_GB.
> > > >> Will be in the next image.
> > > >>
> > > >> Gonzalo
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Chris Leonard
> > > >> <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I believe AU makes their own build with en_GB.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > cjl
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jerry Vonau <me at jvonau.ca>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > > Just wondering how AU is reacting without having the correct
> > > >> > > spelling
> > > >> > > for
> > > >> > > 'favourites', 'neighbourhood' that comes with en_BR. This is a
> > > >> > > regression
> > > >> > > from DX4 that included such support. It would be better would
> > > >> > > really
> > > >> > > support en_AU thou.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > just my thoughts,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Jerry
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> On March 26, 2014 at 6:59 AM Gonzalo Odiard
> > > >> > >> <godiard at sugarlabs.org>
> > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> I think was done to preserve space.
> > > >> > >> Not sure if that is a concern now.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Gonzalo
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:43 PM, me <me at jvonau.ca> wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> > Hi All:
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > I'm wondering if there is any reason why there are po files
> > > >> > >> > generated
> > > >> > >> > for
> > > >> > >> > the source in git, these are included as .mo files in the
> > > >> > >> > src
> > > >> > >> > rpm,
> > > >> > >> > but
> > > >> > >> > not
> > > >> > >> > shipped in the released rpms. Compare the list in git[1]
> > > >> > >> > and
> > > >> > >> > what
> > > >> > >> > becomes
> > > >> > >> > installed in the resulting rpm through "ALL_LINGUAS="[2].
> > > >> > >> > Is
> > > >> > >> > there
> > > >> > >> > any
> > > >> > >> > reason for this? Would it be worthwhile to ship all
> > > >> > >> > available
> > > >> > >> > translations?
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > Jerry
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > 1. https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/tree/master/po
> > > >> > >> > 2.
> > > >> > >> > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/configure.ac
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > >> > >> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > >> > >> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > >> > >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> --
> > > >> > >> Gonzalo Odiard
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> SugarLabs - Learning Software for children
> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> > >> Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > >> > >> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > >> > >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > > >> > > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > >> > > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > >> > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Gonzalo Odiard
> > > >>
> > > >> SugarLabs - Learning Software for children
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gonzalo Odiard
>
> SugarLabs - Learning Software for children