[Sugar-devel] Proposing review 0.102 schedule

Gonzalo Odiard godiard at sugarlabs.org
Mon Mar 10 22:46:41 EDT 2014


Daniel,

I don't want put you in a uncomfortable situation.
All of us are pretty loaded. I don't see how modifying the schedule can
prejudice
you or other in the team. If this change means more work for other, then no
deal.
I will shut up, and load my own charge. If nobody is harm, then I don't see
why we can't
discuss this issue.
I expect we as a community, and specially who are more involved in the work,
can talk openly, and take decisions, or even review our decisions,
without somebody feel uncomfortable for that.
Regards,

Gonzalo


On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>wrote:

> Daniel,
>
> I think that what is behind this request is that there are some
> deployments (Australia and Uruguay) where a few weeks delay wouldn't
> make much difference but carrying a bunch of patches downstream for
> another release cycle will mean a lot of work. I don't think Gonzalo
> made this request lightly. That said, we all respect and will abide by
> your decision as release manager.
>
> thanks.
>
> -walter
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On 10 March 2014 22:53, Gonzalo Odiard <godiard at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Why is the reason to propose this?
> >>
> >> We have a few features almost ready for include.
> >> Almost means, they received a first and in some cases
> >> a second review.
> >
> >
> > I don't understand the rationale. What if I sent a big feature patch
> > today... Would you take it and thus delay the release again? Would you
> > refuse it and thus make me wait more time than if we went with the
> original
> > schedule? The first approach would delay the release forever, the second
> > honestly seems unfair.
> >
> > I'm in a pretty uncomfortable situation. You guys are driving the work,
> I'm
> > just trying to facilitate it... So I don't feel like strongly opposing
> the
> > changes you are proposing. On the other I can't really understand or
> approve
> > the rationale. Perhaps someone more in sync with your release management
> > vision should take over the role...
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>



-- 
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Learning Software for children
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20140310/c11c6799/attachment.html>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list