[Sugar-devel] Testing images with SUgar 0.102

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Hi Sameer,
These images don't have harvest installed.
That is one of the reasons I call them "clean images",
don't have any customization.

Gonzalo


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Sameer Verma <sverma at sfsu.edu> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Gonzalo Odiard <godiard at sugarlabs.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:37 AM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:08:36PM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:36 PM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>
> wrote:
> >> > > Are there any patches in the SL102 branch [1] that you'd like to
> >> > > push upstream?  I've looked at them.
> >> >
> >> > I would love to see official OLPC images with Sugr 0.102, in that
> >> > case you can use everything you want :)
> >>
> >> We're looking into the feasibility of Fedora 20 with Sugar 0.102 now,
> >> so please continue to be involved.  ;-)
> >
> >
> > These are great news! Maybe we can do  chat to coordinate?
> > The next OLPC AU image will be based on F20 too,
> > then we can join forces...
>
> James,
>
> Just a minor point: Address the harvest-client RPM issue for OLPC
> builds, if you can. I know AU needs it, but I don't think the others
> will. Uninstalling harvest-client.rpm on a machine or three is ok, but
> on several will become cumbersome.
>
> It is encouraging to see effort streams coming together.
>
> cheers,
> Sameer
>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > The changes are mostly related with the change in Sugar from GConf
> >> > to GSettings, added dconf as a dependency (we need add it to sugar
> >> > rpm as Requires) and a few configs.
> >>
> >> Yes, I've reviewed the patches, we have some of them in master branch
> >> already, and will take the new ones as needed, but I'm wondering if
> >> _you_ would like to push any of them before I do so?  I've added you
> >> to the xobuild group on crank, so you can rebase on master and push on
> >> /git/projects/olpc-os-builder/
> >
> >
> > Ok, I will look at that.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > The sugar rpms are the Fedora 20 rpms rebuilded in F18.  I just
> >> > needed do a single change in the sugar rpm (I am working with
> >> > pbrobinson to push it upstream) and needed remove libwebkit2gtk from
> >> > the Requires on sugar-toolkit-gtk3
> >>
> >> Thanks.  The OLPC RPM dropbox is available now on dev.laptop.org.
> >> Should we use that or use yours in personal directory?  To use the
> >> dropbox, place them in public_rpms/{f18,f20} (noarch) or
> >> {f18,f20}-{xo1,xo1.5,xo1.75,xo4} (i686 and armv7hl).
> >>
> >
> > Ok, I need check how will work with the AU images, where we use
> > patched rpms. I will try to make it work with the standard (dropbox)
> > if possible.
> >
> >>
> >> > > What effect did the removal of Gnome [2] have on the available
> >> > > disk space on XO-1?  It seemed negligible when I tried it.
> >> >
> >> > I tried to build a XO-1 image with gnome,and just at start Sugar
> >> > show a message of Journal full. Removing gnome solved the problem,
> >> > but I found dconf was not installed, then the configuration were not
> >> > saved. Also gstreamer-python was needed by some activities.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> For 13.2.0 and 13.2.1 we had been building for XO-1 with a smaller
> >> activity set, G1G1Lite, and your Sugarlabs/0.102 set is same on all
> >> laptop models, so somewhat larger.
> >>
> >> The free disk space on your build may be even less than 13.2.1; 729MB
> >> vs 723MB for the .img file.
> >>
> >> You might solve this with a 0.102Lite, but that increases the activity
> >> list maintenance load unless you use Wiki templates.
> >>
> >
> > True. I preferred start with the same group of activities and remove
> Gnome.
> > In general deployments do not include Gnome in the XO1
> > (at least, Uy and Py don't do it)
> > and request for activities as TuxPaint and TuxMath. I am not a fan of
> them,
> > but the idea is make something useful.
> >
> >>
> >> > > Can you also publish the 41001SL0.zd{,.md5} files for use with
> >> > > external SD card?  If not, you might remove [sd_card_image] from
> >> > > your .ini file and save some time.
> >> >
> >> > Ahh, that is the use of these files :)
> >> > Uploading....
> >>
> >> Thanks, I see them uploading.
> >>
> >
> > Uploaded now. There are info about how to install them, right?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I've also begun reproducing the build locally.
> >>
> >> For your interest, hacked [2] kspost.60.nochroot.activities.py and scp
> >> words-21 and turtleblocks-207 from sunjammer because
> >> download.sugarlabs.org 302 redirects to an .au mirror which is out of
> >> sync.
> >>
> >> References:
> >>
> >> 1.  http://wiki.laptop.org/go/RPM_Dropbox
> >>
> >> 2.  http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/z/1XBy9a.txt
> >>
> >> --
> >> James Cameron
> >> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gonzalo Odiard
> >
> > SugarLabs - Software for children learning
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Software for children learning
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20140729/fc30f0d2/attachment.html>